fas username: @anujmore package: rubygem-connection_pool issues to fix: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7523 nonresponsive maintainer bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1780077 fedora-devel mail: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/TKUTVFREP55FRARHKFS2S7FEVP22HC6E/ comainainers: additional notes:
This is a ticket for the Fedora's Policy for nonresponsive package maintainers.
+1
Do you want to take over rubygem-connection_pool? Any other packages?
Metadata Update from @churchyard: - Issue tagged with: nonresponsive maintainer
So, FWIW, +1 from me.
Metadata Update from @churchyard: - Issue assigned to anujmore
Do you want to take over rubygem-connection_pool?
I can take this one.
Any other packages?
I would also take over rubygem-faraday.
However, because I have proven packager bit, I am not interested in being added just as "the package admin" ATM. If that means we should wait for another 2 weeks, I am fine with that.
I think @jackorp would be interested in taking over rubygem-lumberjack.
bodhi doesn't even know that this user exists (which means they never interacted with bodhi?)
Actually this is good thing. Nobody should use Bodhi (unless it is for Rawhide nowadays), because that means things works just fine :blush:
Yes, I would be interested in taking over rubygem-lumberjack.
However, because I have proven packager bit, I am not interested in being added just as "the package admin" ATM.
That makes me curious. Do you actually plan to build rubygem-connection_pool or should I step in as a provenpackager and retire it?
3 days have passed and this was +1'd by various FESCo members. At this point, I would add you as a co-maintainer, but @vondruch is not interested and @jackorp already is.
However, because I have proven packager bit, I am not interested in being added just as "the package admin" ATM. That makes me curious. Do you actually plan to build rubygem-connection_pool or should I step in as a provenpackager and retire it?
It is needed by other packages, so I'll take it when it is possible according to policy or FESCo decision. Adding me now as admin and later as POC is just busywork.
According to policy it is possible now to add you as admin. We can surely skip it now, but I'd appreciate if you could import and build it, it surely generates a lot of noise.
@anujmore Are you still interested in maintaining the packages?
Giving rpms/rubygem-connection_pool to vondruch Giving rpms/rubygem-faraday to vondruch Giving rpms/rubygem-lumberjack to jackorp Giving rpms/rubygem-dotenv to orphan Giving rpms/rubygem-faker to orphan Giving rpms/sound-theme-acoustic to orphan
Metadata Update from @churchyard: - Issue tagged with: pending announcement
Announced.
Metadata Update from @psabata: - Issue untagged with: pending announcement - Issue close_status updated to: Accepted - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
Login to comment on this ticket.