This is a proposal to update the FTBFS policy based on the feedback received after the F30FTBFS retirements and https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/NKFYAWL4GWYR37C6XA63JMNBZYEM6BI3/

Full changes: https://pagure.io/fesco/fesco-docs/pull-request/18

Practical changes with rationales:

• less weekly bugzilla spam required
  • maintainers tend to redirect too much traffic to /dev/null
• no need for public shaming on the devel list
  • the need to do this prevented most of the orphaning - orphaning is good, because there are procedures in place to alert all interested parties,
  • this could have created unfriendly environment, some maintainers consider such e-mail as personal attacks
• orphaning of the packages can happen automatically
  • because there is no need of human intervention
  • I will make sure we actually do this
• retirement only happens if there were reminders, not out of the blue
  • the "out of the blue" retirement was the most criticized part of the F30FTBFS retirements
• maintainers can sweep FTBFS under the rug, but only for a specified time
  • this is a compromise between "this needs to be fixed or we'll retire it" and "maintainers are intimidated by this militant policy"
• maintainers cannot avoid the retirement by closing the bugzillas as WONTFIX
  • this actually happens