I would like to ask FESCo to review this Change proposal:
Improve support for hardware using Intel Bay Trail and Cherry Trail SoCs.
I fully support this, but I'm wondering why this was filed as a Change at all. It seems like the kind of natural HW enablement that happens all the time.
Are there marketing reasons for calling this out as a Change?
+1 in any case.
Well, Bay- and Cherry-Trail are the most common x86-based tablet hardware out there. I can certainly see a marketing blurb about Fedora Workstation tablets.
+1 -- seems straightforward
Metadata Update from @jforbes: - Issue tagged with: meeting
Metadata Update from @jforbes: - Issue untagged with: meeting - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
Login to comment on this ticket.