#66 Decide whether to include chrome-gnome-shell
Opened 2 years ago by pfrields. Modified 10 hours ago

Especially due to the nature of Silverblue, it may be a good idea to include gnome-shell-chrome by default so extensions work through extensions.gnome.org. @mclasen will survey what support is required on other browsers (e.g. Firefox) and report back here.

The WG can vote on inclusion through this ticket since we have no meeting on 2018-08-13.


@mclasen -- any news here on Shell support for other browsers?

it appears that the 'native connector' (ie gnome-shell-chrom) is needed for firefox as well.

See https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/GnomeShellIntegrationForChrome/Installation

We discussed this in today's Workstation WG meeting and agreed:

  • AGREED: Workstation WG agrees to include gnome-shell-chrome (+1:5, 0:0, -1:0) (kalev, 13:42:08)

Metadata Update from @kalev:
- Issue untagged with: meeting

2 years ago

Metadata Update from @catanzaro:
- Issue close_status updated to: Fixed
- Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)

a year ago

Reopening. We should have a Recommends or Supplements somewhere to figure out how to install this during system upgrades.

Metadata Update from @catanzaro:
- Issue status updated to: Open (was: Closed)

3 months ago

Metadata Update from @catanzaro:
- Issue tagged with: meeting-request

3 months ago

Metadata Update from @catanzaro:
- Assignee reset
- Issue untagged with: meeting-request

3 months ago

Does this depend on #138?

Yes, I think it is. Because it's being included in new installations, but not on upgrades (unless someone has done Michael suggested with Recommends/Supplements).

Metadata Update from @chrismurphy:
- Issue marked as depending on: #138

18 hours ago

Metadata Update from @chrismurphy:
- Issue set to the milestone: Fedora 34

18 hours ago

Yes, this issue remains open solely so that we remember it's not installed on upgrades and find a way to fix that.

Login to comment on this ticket.

Metadata