#99 F38 Beta Tests
Closed a month ago by pboy. Opened 2 months ago by pboy.

A short composition of manual tests for F38

  1. Local interactive DVD installation
    • Tested by: pboy
    • Installation complete?
    • Documentation up to date?
  2. Remote interactive DVD installation
    • Tested by:
    • Result? Works
    • Documentation up to date? no content update required
  3. Installation on a Single Board Computer
    • Tested by: pboy
    • Result? Incomplete for some boards
    • Documentation up to date?
  4. Local interactive NET installation / biosboot SW Raid
    • Tested by: pboy
    • Result? Incomplete for some boards
    • Documentation up to date?
  5. Adding virtualization support
    • Tested by: pboy
    • Result? Works
    • Documentation up to date? Not content update required
  6. Installing server VM
    • Tested by: pboy
    • Result? ┬░Failed┬░, Fix ready, waiting for the PR to be executed
    • Documentation up to date? Not content update required
  7. Setting up a PostgresQL Server
    • Tested by: ??
    • Result?
    • Documentation up to date?
  8. Setting up IPA
    • Tested by: ??
    • Result?
    • Documentation up to date? (n/a)
  9. Setting up a systemd-nspawn container
    • Tested by: ??
    • Result? (What about SELinix bugs)
    • Documentation up to date? (n/a)

See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_38_Beta_1.3_Server

Items marked as tested by @coconut are performed by QA automation. I took care of testing the AD Client integration as well as Cockpit usage.

Tested and works OK:
1. Local interactive DVD installation
2. Remote interactive DVD installation
3. Installation on a Single Board Computer (with latest arm-images rc5)
4. Local interactive NET installation / biosboot SW Raid
5. Adding virtualization support
6. Installing server VM

Metadata Update from @pboy:
- Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)

2 months ago

Metadata Update from @pboy:
- Issue status updated to: Open (was: Closed)

2 months ago

As a note for Fedora 39:
We decided to trust the QA automation for IPA. This is justified by the experience with it so far.

Metadata Update from @pboy:
- Issue untagged with: meeting

a month ago

F38 test series completed.

Metadata Update from @pboy:
- Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)

a month ago

Login to comment on this ticket.

Metadata