#3 Should Fedora Server ship a vagrant image?
Closed 6 years ago Opened 6 years ago by sgallagh.

A question was raised by @jrobeson on the #fedora-server IRC channel yesterday:
"since fedora cloud is going all atomic, is fedora server gonna offer vagrant boxes to fill that niche?"

This is an interesting question. On the one hand, it certainly seems to me that we do want Fedora to have an official Vagrant box of some sort. On the other hand, with Fedora Server focused on moving to the modularity approach, I'm not sure if we want to take this on for Fedora 27. I think we probably need to coordinate with the (former?) Cloud WG on this.

Paging @dustymabe and @maxamillion for input from that side of the house.


unfortunately this has been confusing. When we asked about interested in the cloud base image there actually was quite a bit of interest still. I created the cloud-sig pagure repo for that: https://pagure.io/cloud-sig

TL;DR - the cloud group lives on and will continue to deliver cloud base images and vagrant boxes, but with a more focused group of people. There is some overlap with the atomic wg and the cloud base image will benefit from some of the work that the atomic working group does.

@dustymabe OK, then shall we close this and defer to the Cloud SIG for vagrant?

@sgallagh I think that would be best. The server sig could create a vagrant image if they want, but I don't think it would be worth the effort since you should be able to do anything with the cloud base image that you can do with server. Please open issues against https://pagure.io/cloud-sig if you find problems with the vagrant images we are putting out.

Metadata Update from @sgallagh:
- Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)

6 years ago

Login to comment on this ticket.

Metadata