I think it does? Can you be more specific?

FTI cannot link to Koschei as it is not information Koschei tracks or presents.

Ah yes FTI cannot be tracked. For FTBFS

https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/dashboard?users=justinz

This shows FTBFS for Cantor for example. The word cantor links to https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/cantor

The three FTBFS release sections below don't have any external links, just expand to show some info.

It would be great if one of these, or another button linked to Koschei to allow packagers to quickly and easily get to the latest builds and view the logs.

Ah. That report also isn't from Koschei, but from repochecker. I also believe it is a case of a missing arch override. See the README https://pagure.io/ironthree/repochecker

cc @decathorpe

It would be great if there was a tooltip or something that says "data from repochecker, if you believe it's wrong, report an issue <link to issue template>".

Yes, as Miro said, some FTBFS reports are from Koschei, some from repochecker.

@decathorpe would you want these missing override reports on your repo, or this one?

@lbrabec Can we add what Miro suggested? I guess you could reuse hints from api to decide what comes from repochecker and what comes from koschei as koschei reports contain urls to koschei. (I think it's otherwise mixed in the api)

I would be fine with people reporting them on the repochecker repo, as that's where the filters are also maintained. I can add an issue template for that and post the link to it here?

I added an issue template, a link to it works like this.