#13 Improve "failing to install for Fedora rawhide" wording
Opened 3 years ago by churchyard. Modified 3 years ago

"failing to install for Fedora rawhide" could be replaced with: "python3-IPy fails to install in Fedora rawhide"

Note that actual package name (could be multiple).

It could also show the reason in the footnote:

Nothing provides: python(abi) = 3.8


"failing to install for Fedora rawhide" could be replaced with: "python3-IPy fails to install in Fedora rawhide"

I just felt that having the package name in the sentence is unnecessarily redundant. But I can add the name.

Note that actual package name (could be multiple).

What do you mean by this, do you have any examples?

It could also show the reason in the footnote:

Nothing provides: python(abi) = 3.8

Some packages have a long list (one example right now is pythran), we decided to show just failing architectures and make the FTI item collapsible. On click the item extends and show all the problems.

Initial work is deployed, please try it and tell us your feedback.

Metadata Update from @lbrabec:
- Issue assigned to lbrabec

3 years ago

What do you mean by this, do you have any examples?

A component can have one or more subpackages failing to install.

E.g.: python3-ipython-tests fails to install is less severe than python3-ipython fails to install. Sometimes, it is both.

IIUIC the "reasons" are being shown now. Is the A component can have one or more subpackages failing to install. still valid, or is it solved already?

A component can have one or more subpackages failing to install is still valid.

Login to comment on this ticket.

Metadata