| |
@@ -898,6 +898,33 @@
|
| |
"USER_LOGIN": "false"
|
| |
}
|
| |
},
|
| |
+ "check_packages_signed": {
|
| |
+ "profiles": {
|
| |
+ "fedora-BaseOS-dvd-iso-x86_64-*-64bit": 50,
|
| |
+ "fedora-CoreOS-colive-iso-x86_64-*-64bit": 20,
|
| |
+ "fedora-IoT-dvd_ostree-iso-aarch64-*-aarch64": 20,
|
| |
+ "fedora-IoT-dvd_ostree-iso-x86_64-*-64bit": 20,
|
| |
+ "fedora-KDE-live-iso-x86_64-*-64bit": 15,
|
| |
+ "fedora-Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz-aarch64-*-aarch64": 12,
|
| |
+ "fedora-Server-dvd-iso-aarch64-*-aarch64": 10,
|
| |
+ "fedora-Server-dvd-iso-ppc64le-*-ppc64le": 10,
|
| |
+ "fedora-Server-dvd-iso-x86_64-*-64bit": 10,
|
| |
+ "fedora-Server-raw_xz-raw.xz-aarch64-*-aarch64": 12,
|
| |
+ "fedora-Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso-ppc64le-*-ppc64le": 50,
|
| |
+ "fedora-Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso-x86_64-*-64bit": 50,
|
| |
+ "fedora-Workstation-live-iso-ppc64le-*-ppc64le": 10,
|
| |
+ "fedora-Workstation-live-iso-x86_64-*-64bit": 10,
|
| |
+ "fedora-Workstation-live_osbuild-iso-x86_64-*-64bit": 60,
|
| |
+ "fedora-Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz-aarch64-*-aarch64": 12,
|
| |
+ "fedora-i3-live-x86_64-*-64bit": 70
|
| |
+ },
|
| |
+ "settings": {
|
| |
+ "BOOTFROM": "c",
|
| |
+ "HDD_1": "disk_%FLAVOR%_%MACHINE%.qcow2",
|
| |
+ "POSTINSTALL": "check_packages_signed",
|
| |
+ "START_AFTER_TEST": "%DEPLOY_UPLOAD_TEST%"
|
| |
+ }
|
| |
+ },
|
| |
"cloud_autocloud": {
|
| |
"profiles": {
|
| |
"fedora-Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2-aarch64-*-aarch64": 30,
|
| |
@@ -1733,7 +1760,7 @@
|
| |
},
|
| |
"settings": {
|
| |
"PACKAGE_SET": "default",
|
| |
- "POSTINSTALL": "_collect_data",
|
| |
+ "POSTINSTALL": "check_packages_signed _collect_data",
|
| |
"RETRY": "%INSTALL_RETRY%"
|
| |
}
|
| |
},
|
| |
This came up in blocker bug meeting discussion today. We really
should check that all packages are signed after a default install.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson awilliam@redhat.com