Applications offered in Silverblue should be same as those in Fedora Workstation. This is currently not true.
Apps planned to be part of Silverblue as Flatpaks:
cheese evince file-roller gnome-calculator gedit gnome-font-viewer gnome-maps gnome-screenshot eog gnome-clocks gnome-contacts gnome-documents gnome-music gnome-photos gnome-weather baobab gnome-boxes gnome-disk-utility gnome-keyring gnome-logs simple-scan gnome-characters gnome-system-monitor gnome-terminal
I'll get clarifications on some differences (missing Totem, Rhythmbox, LO Writer, maybe some others).
Enabling this test even if it wouldn't pass for some time still makes sense to see if something present in SIlverblue got broken IMO.
Enabling this is not a big issue and should be fairly easy. However, if the list of applications in Silverblue is different from Workstation, the test will fail. We could workaround the differences, if we know where they lie.
Do we know which applications exactly should be part of the default Silverblue? Does @eischmann know?
Metadata Update from @lruzicka: - Issue assigned to lruzicka
On the latest Silverblue, some of the applications are not present and can only be installed, namely:
The apps you provided are a future status-quo?
Metadata Update from @adamwill: - Issue tagged with: silverblue
Login to comment on this ticket.