= bug description = F-16 alpha shipped witha boot.iso that did not have isohybrid run on it, this means you can not just dd it to a usb drive and boot it.
= bug analysis = slipped though as there was no test case
= fix recommendation =
lorax has been fixed, but we should make sure we cover it in testing.
Sure, sounds good. Do you think there should be a release criterion for this - i.e. should it be required to be working? for Alpha, Beta, Final...?
it should be alpha, its a supported method of installing. it should always work.
I think we can probably subsume this into the ticket for expanding testing of USB boot:
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/260
Metadata Update from @adamwill: - Issue untagged with: test review - Issue tagged with: test cases
Metadata Update from @kparal: - Issue assigned to adamwill (was: adamw)
wow, imagine a time when we could fail to notice this. :D
I would say the current state of https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_44_Rawhide_20251101.n.0_Installation#Default_boot_and_install_(x86_64) means this is covered - we have the "USB BIOS" and "USB UEFI" columns and the preamble notes that they are required.
We're attempting to automate this in https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/os-autoinst-distri-fedora/pull-request/451 , too.
This issue has been migrated to Fedora Forge: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/quality/tickets/issues/236
Please continue any further discussion there.
Log in to comment on this ticket.