#147 bugimg shows invalid information
Opened 3 months ago by kparal. Modified 3 months ago


To be clear, both RejectedBlockers (33-beta and 33-final) shouldn't be displayed (or I'm misunderstanding something).

@lbrabec talked to me about this and I already managed to forget half of it. But the basic issue seems to be that whenever a bug is proposed against some blocker milestone and then the milestone gets removed, that bug proposal is marked as rejected (even though there doesn't have to be a RejectedBlocker in the Whiteboard). I'm not sure whether this is a bug or intentional and why. But that's how BBA is currently implemented. And the discussion code then inherits this.

In order to fix this, we need to look at why BBA behaves the way it does (that only amplifies the need to document your code, let's see if we did that or not), and possibly fix a bug (looking into the Whiteboard) or say this is how we want this (I'm not convinced at this moment).

Metadata Update from @kparal:
- Issue priority set to: Normal (was: High)

3 months ago

Metadata Update from @kparal:
- Assignee reset

3 months ago

Metadata Update from @kparal:
- Issue tagged with: next

3 months ago

Login to comment on this ticket.

Metadata
Boards 1
Next tasks Status: Ideas
Attachments 1
Attached 3 months ago View Comment