Bug details: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2134177 Information from BlockerBugs App: <img alt="2134177" src="https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/api/v0/bugimg/2134177" />
Commented but haven't voted yet: catanzaro, frantisekz, pbrobinson
The votes have been last counted at 2022-10-13 08:46 UTC and the last processed comment was #comment-821169
To learn how to vote, see: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review A quick example: BetaBlocker +1 (where the tracker name is one of BetaBlocker/FinalBlocker/BetaFE/FinalFE/0Day/PreviousRelease and the vote is one of +1/0/-1)
BetaBlocker +1
BetaBlocker
FinalBlocker
BetaFE
FinalFE
0Day
PreviousRelease
+1
0
-1
FinalBlocker +1
How important is Rockchip RK3399? I have never heard of it.
It's at least in Pinebook Pro/Pinephone Pro.
I'm: FinalBlocker +1 on this, though might be willing to waive it as late-proposed / difficult-to-fix if no fix appears viable, since we can document the workaround.
AGREED AcceptedFinalBlocker
The following votes have been closed:
It's basically one of the best cheap devices for running Workstation ATM, it's in the Pinebook Pro and a lot of the devices we actively support Workstation/IoT on. The vast majority of cheap arm devices with the work rock in their name a probably based on this SoC.
Metadata Update from @blockerbot: - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
Release F37 is no longer tracked by BlockerBugs, closing this ticket.
Login to comment on this ticket.