#781 [gnome-contacts] Editting of an existing contact creates another entry with empty content. | rhbz#2079198
Closed 3 months ago by blockerbot. Opened 4 months ago by blockerbot.

Bug details: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079198
Information from BlockerBugs App:
2079198

Current vote summary

Commented but haven't voted yet: kparal

The votes have been last counted at 2022-04-28 16:04 UTC and the last processed comment was #comment-794852

To learn how to vote, see:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review
A quick example: BetaBlocker +1 (where the tracker name is one of BetaBlocker/FinalBlocker/BetaFE/FinalFE/0Day/PreviousRelease and the vote is one of +1/0/-1)


FinalBlocker -1

The basic functionality works, just with an annoying (and temporary?) side effect in some cases.

I'd probably also vote -1 for the comment 0 description. But merging contacts just because you mistyped an email address (are they using email as a primary ID or what?) and then randomly switch contact names feels worse, see comment 3. I can file it separately, if you want to vote on it separately, though.

You can always delete the duplicated contact which is like an empty box. The original contact gets correctly updated. At least when I tried. If others do not find it that bad, I can also live with

FinalBlocker -1

Contrary opinion: I'm inclined to say this is basic functionality failure. At least it's pretty embarrassing. Sadly, it's not a new issue: I've know about this for a long time.

FinalBlocker +1

(In the off chance this somehow gets accepted despite all the -1 votes, we can also consider the late blocker rule to release anyway.)

Contrary opinion: I'm inclined to say this is basic functionality failure. At least it's pretty embarrassing. Sadly, it's not a new issue: I've know about this for a long time.

Sorry to ask but ... if you have known about this problem and you think it is "basic functionality", why didn't you propose it then?

Sorry to ask but ... if you have known about this problem and you think it is "basic functionality", why didn't you propose it then?

Hm, although it is a basic functionality failure in a core app, I suppose I probably am not regularly thinking about Fedora release blocker process when trying to edit contacts....

Metadata Update from @blockerbot:
- Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)

3 months ago

Release F36 is no longer tracked by BlockerBugs, closing this ticket.

Login to comment on this ticket.

Metadata