#677 [Changes Tracking] No ifcfg by default | rhbz#2045875
Closed 2 years ago by blockerbot. Opened 2 years ago by blockerbot.

Bug details: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2045875
Information from BlockerBugs App:
2045875

Current vote summary

The votes have been last counted at 2022-03-19 16:14 UTC and the last processed comment was #comment-786695

To learn how to vote, see:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review
A quick example: BetaBlocker +1 (where the tracker name is one of BetaBlocker/FinalBlocker/BetaFE/FinalFE/0Day/PreviousRelease and the vote is one of +1/0/-1)


BetaBlocker -1

The person who nominated this bug said the issues are solved in anaconda now, so I'm not sure what basis there is for making this a blocker.

I think the request here was "please pull the Change into Beta, it's ready now". Which should be an FE, if anything, not a blocker.

BetaBlocker -1

I wouldn't want to pull this in as an FE if we try an RC today, if we slip a week it maaaaay be okay to pull it in.

BetaBlocker -1

No violated release criterion was identified here.

AGREED RejectedBetaBlocker

if there's more to this, we can always revote.

The following votes have been closed:

BetaFE +1

Nervously. This seems like it could be a little risky, but it would be good to have this on Beta media to maximize testing.

I'd like to see this go through, but I hear AdamW's concerns. I want to see it in testing and that needs to include the Vagrant images.
BetaFE +1

The following votes have been closed:

Metadata Update from @blockerbot:
- Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)

2 years ago

Release F36 is no longer tracked by BlockerBugs, closing this ticket.

Login to comment on this ticket.

Metadata