Hello there,

Well just a few points worth noting.

Every release, I called for some documents (FEL flyer and Release Notes) review in front of the marketing team. I do this as FEL Spin maintainer and my responsibility to report back to Fedora Board since I'm granted the use of Fedora Trademark.

The Marketing team (while I understand FEL technical details might not be relevant for even a software engineer) should focus on [[BR]]
* Proper use of Fedora Trademark (whether little or too much)[[BR]]
* whether FEL as a Fedora suproject is getting the desired marketing value [[BR]]
* how the FEL spin can also give value to other Fedora "products" [[BR]]
* Proper feedback from the community and upstream [[BR]]

This is basically what the review is about and this procedure should also be used for other spins or fedora subprojects.

I would not make any drastic change to the layout of the PDF document or choosing another media, since I have used up all my time dedicated for FEL documents. The PDF layout is basically what you can see in any Corporate Release Notes [:1] I will consider any input that gives Fedora and upstream a marketing value with the success of FEL and any suggestions for improvement are welcome.

Since you opened a ticket here, I've closed the FEL ticket
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab/ticket/52

[:1] http://www.synopsys.com/Support/Licensing/Licensing/Documents/Dockeys/scl_11.0_release_notes.pdf

Deadline: Before final release.

outdated ticket, closing - we need to figure out a better way of doing these things for the next release cycle, we haven't been able to handle "consulting requests."

Milestone F12b: Alpha to Beta deleted