#210 Propose bugs to discuss at meeting
Closed: Fixed a year ago by siosm. Opened 2 years ago by justinz.

I won't be at the meeting but I'd like these discussed, should be fairly simple and fast.

[1]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036780
Add build-time dependency to add functionality

[2]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2054995
Add runtime dependencies to enable full functionality:
eglinfo is supplied by egl-utils (18kB)
wayland-info is supplied by wayland-utils (49kB)

[3]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2029294
Policy on updates to Alphas?


@justinz Can you do the second one?

The discussion about the third one lead us to https://www.strawberrymusicplayer.org/ which is apparently maintained and would probably be a better fit.

Metadata Update from @siosm:
- Issue untagged with: meeting
- Issue tagged with: packaging

2 years ago

@justinz Can you do the second one?

The discussion about the third one lead us to https://www.strawberrymusicplayer.org/ which is apparently maintained and would probably be a better fit.

I assume you mean the third one. I had a look and Strawberry is already in the repository. I checked Amarok and it's still getting commits, just no recent releases. Was moreso just curious on if there is a policy of updating or skipping alpha releases of updates so we can respond to the bug report.

Was there a consensus to add the runtime dependencies for this bug? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2054995

Was there a consensus to add the runtime dependencies for this bug? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2054995

Yes. We considered it fine to go and do it.

Thanks, have done this, builds in progress for Rawhide + F36.

On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 8:36 AM Neal Gompa pagure@pagure.io wrote:

ngompa added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``

Was there a consensus to add the runtime dependencies for this bug?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2054995

Yes. We considered it fine to go and do it.
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/fedora-kde/SIG/issue/210

1 Pending testing in RHBZ ticket
2 Done
3 Need answer on policy of updating to alphas

For 3, we can do it, but Amarok doesn't seem to be maintained at all...

Wrt, item 3 and amarok,

I'm not all that keen in maintaining it anymore given the upstream status. Probably my last act as maintainer would be to merge any PR implementing the alpha upgrade request,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2029294

I'll likely orphan it soon, either to be dropped or picked up by a more-motivated maintainer

1 will ship with the KDE Gear 22.08 update
2 is fixed
3 is about an alpha release for a software that is not really well maintained

So I'm going to close this one.

Metadata Update from @siosm:
- Issue close_status updated to: Fixed
- Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)

2 years ago

Issue status updated to: Open (was: Closed)

a year ago

Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
Issue close_status updated to: Fixed

a year ago

Login to comment on this ticket.

Metadata
Boards 1
Packaging Status: Done