We should be shipping xdg-desktop-portal-kde, something is wrong here. Do we need to ship xdg-desktop-portal-gnome too?

@siosm, @rdieter: are we missing something here?

Yes, keep shipping xdg-desktop-portal-kde. However, now, xdg-desktop-portal-gtk is broken because it was updated and built without the settings portal, that was shifted to xdg-desktop-portal-gnome. So now, on KDE wayland, in order to have good anti aliased fonts in GTK applications on wayland, xdg-desktop-portal-gnome needs to be shipped also, in addition to xdg-desktop-portal-kde, or xdg-desktop-portal-gtk needs to be rebuilt with the settings portal which is now optional.

Basically, without xdg-desktop-portal-gnome, fonts are jagged (non-antialiased) in GTK applications on flatpak, in KDE wayland session. Previously xdg-desktop-portal-gtk, which I think comes by default, fixed that. However, the latest update to xdg-desktop-portal-gtk removed the settings portal needed for font settings in flatpak applications, now there's a new xdg-desktop-portal-gnome package that is needed. xdg-desktop-portal-kde does not contain the needed settings portal for gtk applications running in flatpak.

Oh man, what a mess... 🤦‍♂️

@ngompa Do you understand the issue?

Yeah, sadly I do. The transition to xdg-desktop-portal-gnome for GNOME is unfortunately rather disruptive since they're yanking settings from xdg-desktop-portal-gtk in the process.

The runtime dependencies for xdg-desktop-portal-gnome don't look that bad, so we can ship it. But how is the more interesting question. We get xdg-desktop-portal-gtk through the rich dependency that pulls it in when gtk3 is installed. Do we ask for this with gtk4 then? Or do we just bite the bullet and add it to the kickstart to pull it in?

I'm not sure, I'm not a developer / packager, just a passionate end user who likes to report bugs.

Also reported in https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/logout-login-bugs-in-plasma-wayland-should-i-be-using-x11/33226/7

I think we should at least add it to the default set of packages for Kinoite as Flatpaks are the primary way to install applications there. No opinion for the classic KDE Spin.

It's not like we don't have Flatpak enablement shipped in the mainline KDE spin either, so I'm inclined to ship it there too, it's just I'm not sure what the best mechanism is.

We can add it to our comps group.

https://pagure.io/workstation-ostree-config/pull-request/247

https://pagure.io/fedora-comps/pull-request/683

Merged the comps PR