#9322 EPEL8: no package.cfg in new branches
Closed: Fixed 3 years ago by humaton. Opened 3 years ago by tdawson.

Describe what you would like us to do:


Currently, when a maintainer requests an epel8 branch, they also get an epel8-playground branch, and a package.cfg file is put in their epel8 branch.
We (the EPEL Steering Committee) have agreed on a new vision for EPEL8 Playground, that doesn't include automatic building of all epel8 packages.
Please remove the step that adds package.cfg to the epel8 branch.

So, when a maintainer requests an epel8 branch, they also get an epel8-playground branch, but that's it. No package.cfg is added to either branch.

When do you need this to be done by? (YYYY/MM/DD)


2020/09/22


This is likely a patch to https://pagure.io/fedscm-admin to not add this file.

This will require dev work and release. No promises on our side to have this done by next week.

OK, I didn't know the work process for this, I was hoping it would have been simpler.
Do I need a separate issue or bug for this?
Or is this issue sufficient?

Metadata Update from @mohanboddu:
- Issue close_status updated to: Upstream
- Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)

3 years ago

Metadata Update from @mohanboddu:
- Issue status updated to: Open (was: Closed)

3 years ago

Metadata Update from @mohanboddu:
- Issue assigned to humaton
- Issue priority set to: Waiting on Assignee (was: Needs Review)
- Issue tagged with: dev, medium-gain, medium-trouble

3 years ago

There is a stable build for f32,f33, and rawhide. Once people update to the latest release all newly processed epel8 requests will not include the package.cfg

Metadata Update from @humaton:
- Issue close_status updated to: Fixed
- Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)

3 years ago

Login to comment on this ticket.

Metadata
Boards 1
dev Status: Done
Related Pull Requests
  • #49 Merged 3 years ago