Please elaborate how is this request different from #7653 ? Is the existing Jenkins project not sufficient?

In our IRC communication @bstinson mentioned that they are slowly migrating things away from that namespace and that Java SIG will have its own namespace.

Is there any update here? If Fedora infrastructure is not able to handle this request then we (Java package maintainers) will need to look for a different solution for building Java packaging documentation.

@siddharthvipul1 Maybe you could help as well on this ticket?

@pingou Sadly I can't. We don't have a central master yet to provision accounts. Brian is coming with it so that both of us have access to it. I had created a ticket on bugs.centos.org for this [0]. I will ask Brian to see if this can be done in urgent.
[0] https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=15997

You folks should have access here via your FAS accounts:

https://jenkins-fedora-java-sig.apps.ci.centos.org/

Don't worry about maintaining plugins, or anything like that. We'll lifecycle this master image for you.

We have a few options, you can build an image and post it to dockerhub/quay.io/registry.fp.o and pull that for use in your job, or we can look at doing a custom set of images for you like we did for:
https://pagure.io/aquedoc

Thanks @bstinson
Do you know where I can find terms of use for this Jenkins instance? I'm failing to find them. I'm not very familiar with CentOS infrastructure.

Jenkins instance has been created and if there are any issues we'll be opening new tickets.