On Thursday I sent an e-mail reply to https://pagure.io/Fedora-Badges/issue/560 but the comment never made it onto the issue. Here is the full e-mail, as recorded in my sent box:
Subject: Re: [Fedora-Badges] Issue #560: Badge idea: When packagers raise the epoch of their package and downgrade the version To: reply+7788abf9b6a9c25218450e9a1bad043ad35b76b13cd039adc9b16b7d165d78c3b5a222c279af9271dad7a18ece30a41b0d80a2c0cb45c980b5133e06b3e6e1d0@pagure.io References: <Fedora-Badges-ticket-0f94d43bf4fa4a9b9878d162f683e0d2-464139@pagure.io> From: Randy Barlow <randy@electronsweatshop.com> Message-ID: <e6cb9749-2f01-bba4-8da7-3cbe23345e85@electronsweatshop.com> Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 12:39:46 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <Fedora-Badges-ticket-0f94d43bf4fa4a9b9878d162f683e0d2-464139@pagure.io> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lnOSBvUFSxu9Eodvukqg3gN16DhFjcO5o" This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --lnOSBvUFSxu9Eodvukqg3gN16DhFjcO5o Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Gsxc2WFnGJiW4GIaU9XjNruVasG12AdkN"; protected-headers="v1" From: Randy Barlow <randy@electronsweatshop.com> To: reply+7788abf9b6a9c25218450e9a1bad043ad35b76b13cd039adc9b16b7d165d78c3b5a222c279af9271dad7a18ece30a41b0d80a2c0cb45c980b5133e06b3e6e1d0@pagure.io Message-ID: <e6cb9749-2f01-bba4-8da7-3cbe23345e85@electronsweatshop.com> Subject: Re: [Fedora-Badges] Issue #560: Badge idea: When packagers raise the epoch of their package and downgrade the version References: <Fedora-Badges-ticket-0f94d43bf4fa4a9b9878d162f683e0d2-464139@pagure.io> In-Reply-To: <Fedora-Badges-ticket-0f94d43bf4fa4a9b9878d162f683e0d2-464139@pagure.io> --Gsxc2WFnGJiW4GIaU9XjNruVasG12AdkN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 09/06/2017 09:45 PM, Sayan Chowdhury wrote: > @bowlofeggs do you know if there is fedmsg message for it? or how to de= termine this via fedmsg? I doubt there is a fedmsg directly for this, but there are fedmsgs when spec files are changed. We could make something that looks for those fedmsgs and analyzed the diff to see if there is a +Epoch line? --Gsxc2WFnGJiW4GIaU9XjNruVasG12AdkN-- --lnOSBvUFSxu9Eodvukqg3gN16DhFjcO5o Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJZsXZSAAoJEHhEzLg73SRizB4P/R63ZhWpzntjZpI77ftUjxTH /3caxhVn0fcdE5ESH8X7E5nu2h164Truut8FmTcQvxtPSK95E/cQAZ3BsxE5Z+Oz m7DFTEQquUDP3Fm4suJgxRWxI1vEiNIC7FNfWbIEZqVcuSxRwu9AM0KR303I1zXX b8kbEoFzuq4+10h3CzccoLuRD9G+u6zECcWeenEHEDt9zGqxhWiidZk6eEe6yyxl dNuWE14AkebvS5CkAlaB35AzRc4H8zJ4RDZrUeVzDoXC/QJ8DGAiz0J7OLN9SjmI iTYy3SwBKff9hZttm0a1FldroZM8rRJIotNSlYSdaKhLMXRcfVaTqa7LvfC+TIkT MEry5lfTuBsNdZqOv2R2e/g8jCwMrYSDknTKN7b05SsuuExaXnIjF68W9rKtnJXR gi0oWdImpDL5xhva6fOdEcHacmMtYvgr/dsylRzhMb7YCF6cdtadaowFjTJPDAX4 ANU+0hPQdLzA5Y112Y0oV829wwBsgyzcc9rwboywU1HM30AEQR601kR7sp+HdVw8 PY303oshKdsbW+XgIwD2O8cdqGEDhmU/IhNEfy7TsaE5j+ogc/HkleLFvRiZkxGR M4+IpRuHacYT5qEcg+lrAz0PSAVd26qEzNBmRYrbonN7N/yJz1C6Yd9cgJn4+p3g VtjgtuZMX2VtipYvZTi1 =lJrm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lnOSBvUFSxu9Eodvukqg3gN16DhFjcO5o--
I also have a record of that e-mail going to the SMTP relay my server uses:
Sep 7 12:39:48 hatch postfix/smtp[23666]: 81C962100FA1: to=<reply+7788abf9b6a9c25218450e9a1bad043ad35b76b13cd039adc9b16b7d165d78c3b5a222c279af9271dad7a18ece30a41b0d80a2c0cb45c980b5133e06b3e6e1d0@pagure.io>, relay=smtp-server.nc.rr.com[107.14.166.72]:25, delay=1, delays=0.49/0.05/0.29/0.21, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 OK C4/11-12431-45671B95) Sep 7 12:39:48 hatch postfix/qmgr[2238]: 81C962100FA1: removed
In the logs on the pagure side:
Sep 07 16:39:49 pagure01.fedoraproject.org python2[11629]: mail from: <randy@electronsweatshop.com> - () Sep 07 16:39:49 pagure01.fedoraproject.org python2[11629]: ('<reply+7788abf9b6a9c25218450e9a1bad043ad35b76b13cd039adc9b16b7d165d78c3b5a222c279af9271dad7a18ece30a41b0d80a2c0cb45c980b5133e06b3e6e1d0@pagure.io>', {}) Sep 07 16:39:49 pagure01.fedoraproject.org python2[11629]: msg-ig <Fedora-Badges-ticket-0f94d43bf4fa4a9b9878d162f683e0d2-464139@pagure.io> Sep 07 16:39:49 pagure01.fedoraproject.org python2[11629]: To reply+7788abf9b6a9c25218450e9a1bad043ad35b76b13cd039adc9b16b7d165d78c3b5a222c279af9271dad7a18ece30a41b0d80a2c0cb45c980b5133e06b3e6e1d0@pagure.io Sep 07 16:39:49 pagure01.fedoraproject.org python2[11629]: Cc None Sep 07 16:39:49 pagure01.fedoraproject.org python2[11629]: From Randy Barlow <randy@electronsweatshop.com> Sep 07 16:39:49 pagure01.fedoraproject.org python2[11629]: hash: c709d0c5d4e7d1a397aaff57fe7e98a0c31ce31a4f0b9ef167090fd127215f929ca2275835aa12a0fbf8249f18214d3f15b5cb8659b6f1431e3783724a2363a2 Sep 07 16:39:49 pagure01.fedoraproject.org python2[11629]: tohash: 7788abf9b6a9c25218450e9a1bad043ad35b76b13cd039adc9b16b7d165d78c3b5a222c279af9271dad7a18ece30a41b0d80a2c0cb45c980b5133e06b3e6e1d0 Sep 07 16:39:49 pagure01.fedoraproject.org python2[11629]: Hash does not correspond to the destination
@pingou Any ideas there?
Seeing the hash not matching, I'd like to confirm something.
@bowlofeggs is your email address exlectronsweatshop linked to your account on pagure?
@pingou Yes, I see both my electronsweatshop.com and my fpo address in my Pagure settings.
Also, I tried to reply to this issue with both addresses, and neither reply seems to have made it here.
@bowlofeggs let's try to do a test while we're both on IRC so I can tail the logs precisely :)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJZw/kjAAoJEHhEzLg73SRi44kP/R/ImfVNyEGWj1PC2daSsyA+ PCcw8bT+NHgvoOP2w4NYH+ikqMFvY1iiAYMIgp05lxWXFD6AqXSxwDdibB87NTCD VJV24NylwMvrzyYMoGCvlSsMzq7/9X+ma+lHeFy7VvzgDgkDvrGC7mGkaYp1vlEZ /HnZkOXboiLNwnNCq5Ovsnbu8T7P6TMNzTxpnLIEfzKczZIVKTeg46SA5IKmsZSJ iIjBYo1Ms9/jBIk1H+VimigCvDrfk90+0rDrrtfNl7ekxrk4CfSP5oAeHq2xwDQc 77Aq/Oc5beBTiOSOV/lYFgnKXWKavjnVPD5QX2iWp3ogOxelk9hn9e6FrjZyE+vS /bP6i/IWHBZfX5in9t1rRsUJJGN2E5gyZZZ075ff1e6JQIMDFiYEYlh38LZX7U8G tMNBq1VlJkEwyQaNyJ2cSQo5ll9KvOzGdRJB7T6vLMJwObN6i0LKqcwD2URJVAQF ufCgTZu+VXQcex4zL+iaIyYH1DiijLCFrR+xP00xkHYtOV8II0g1ne44XvGq2NEm KjVwPO4R5qaCdrOPiG4TVIYiB9KdkLbs8qSqNoKqUjN3f1Zu4vZJt85LjJj09nSw nt6a9CFCKi01FZDXRDwMwWHU2jyMxhOt1JlH/Ud1LWhgOuPZS09toyEfbYWbtvji P8ENJBZk+NfdbN76S0kY =jvcf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
ok, sounds like this was tracked down to pagure being very picky about email replies. It expects replies only from the exact email that it sent to. @pingou is already fixing this to be more flexable upstream.
I'm gonna close this one out now. Feel free to reopen if you feel this is in error or there is more to do here.
:rice:
Metadata Update from @kevin: - Issue close_status updated to: Fixed - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
Login to comment on this ticket.