#1312 A comment box at FAS for commenting while rejecting someone.
Closed: Fixed None Opened 14 years ago by susmit.

I just noticed this. If someone is a admin or a sponsor of a particular FAS group, he/she may wish to turn down few applications for joining the particular group.

It would be nice to have a text field to submit the reason of rejection. It is useful if the admin wants the applicant reapply after correcting a certain mistake.

I am attaching two screenshots. One is the current FAS page, another one from mailman, which provides exacly what I am looking for.


Starting to look into implementation.

Rework the editing portion to be like mailman. Here are snippets of a conversation with toshio:

{{{
16:39 < abadger1999> StylusEater: Yeah, it would.
--
16:40 < abadger1999> StylusEater: It might be annoying to have two steps
everytime you click reject (if you have to reject a lot of
people).
--
16:41 < abadger1999> StylusEater: Maybe -- add a reject-all function at the
same time?
--
16:41 < StylusEater> abadger1999: yes. it would be annoying.
--
16:42 < abadger1999> StylusEater: or reject takes you to a screen that lets you
select multiple usernames to reject and enter a single
reason that applies to all of them?
--
16:43 < StylusEater> abadger1999: so we have sponsor, remove, upgrade and
downgrade
--
16:43 < StylusEater> abadger1999: err and approve
--
16:45 < StylusEater> abadger1999: I iterated each because I'm thinking the
workflow might need more adjusting ...
--
16:46 < StylusEater> abadger1999: b/c if we do the above suggestion then why
not do the same for the others?
--
16:46 < StylusEater> abadger1999: I imagine you've thought about that a bit...
can you elaborate?
--
16:47 < abadger1999> StylusEater: Make it more like the mailman interface --
radio buttons for each user in the queue and a single
Submit button to commit all your changes.
16:48 < abadger1999> StylusEater: rather than links for each user that you have
to activate one by one.
}}}

Any news here? I wonder if this shouldn't be in the fas trac...

Filed upstream as:

https://github.com/fedora-infra/fas/issues/77

Closing here now. Hopefully we can get this in fas3.

Login to comment on this ticket.

Metadata