Hello Fedora Infra Team,
I would like to request the creation of a new organization and associated team in Fedora Forge.
New Organization Details:
Desired Organization Name (Short Name): reproducible-builds Full Name of Organization: Fedora Reproducible Builds Description of Organization's Purpose: This organization will host issue and documentation repositories and coordinate collaboration on reproducible builds in Fedora. Website URL (Optional): https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/reproducible-builds/ Avatar/Logo (Optional): https://in.waw.pl/~zbyszek/fedora/fedora-reproducible-builds.png Fedora Accounts Group for Organization Owners: sponsors of "reproducible-builds"
We don't particularly care about the organization name. If "reproducible-builds" is too long or otherwise inappropriate, something shorter/different would be OK.
Please let me know if further information is required.
reproducible-builds-members: zbyszek, jelly, dcavalca
This brings up the question if this should be it's own org or if we should have a more general 'packaging' org that has these repos in it, or if packaging related things should just be repos under fesco org?
I think fesco should be its own org.
But I like the idea of moving various "packaging things" under one organization. Close cooperation between various groups of macro packages and language-specific tools and stuff like add-det is often required. It'd be much nicer to have this under one umbrella with two dozen contributors is much more appealing than having 8 or 10 different organizations and having always to decide where each specific tool should live.
add-det
If we can have a team for reproducible builds under this, I think that'd work nicely for us.
Metadata Update from @james: - Issue priority set to: Waiting on Assignee (was: Needs Review) - Issue tagged with: forgejo_migration, low-gain, low-trouble
Metadata Update from @ryanlerch: - Issue assigned to ryanlerch
i'm a +1 for a "packaging" org
How about this structure:
Packaging
WFM, if I'm in the -owners group and can manage access to the subgroups I'm interested in without hassle. In general, I would expect that "senior" packagers would have access across the repos in this organization. In particular this would include people working on rpmautospec, packaging guidelines, tooling for specific languages, etc. I think it's crucial to have a larger group of people with access to the the basic Fedora tooling so that we don't end up with chokepoints.
-owners
not sure how wide of a consultation we need on making a decisiion like this before we just implement this group layout...
Not sure. Perhaps we should run it by fesco?
I think it sounds fine and there's other things that would fit nicely under such an org.
→ https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3499
After the discussion in the fesco ticket and during the meting today, the general sentiment was that having the sigs as the top-level namespace is better. Thus, I'm returning to the original request for a reproducible-builds organization.
reproducible-builds
Thanks for using Fedora Forge!
I have:
Note: we can add other groups (like a members group if you want) -- but i figured with such a small team, giving you all owner status on the org in forge is probably the simplest way.
reproduciblebuilds
Added 1 teams to the new reproduciblebuilds org:
Updated the teams mapping so the Fedora Accounts teams map, and on next login any users in the Fedora Accounts groups will be granted access to the mapped teams in Fedora Forge.
anyone that is a member in the forge-reproduciblebuilds-owners group is mapped to the Owners team on the reproduciblebuilds org on forge
forge-reproduciblebuilds-owners
Owners
Next Steps 1. Update the settings for your org, including the details like description etc -https://forge.fedoraproject.org/reproduciblebuilds/settings 3. Add a profile page for your organization: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/forge-documentation/create_org_profile_page/ 4. Migrate from Pagure: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/forge-documentation/migration/pagure_repository/
Metadata Update from @ryanlerch: - Issue close_status updated to: Fixed - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
Thanks. I filed https://gitlab.com/fedora/design/team/requests/-/issues/119.
I followed the migration guides and it all worked nicely. No issues encountered.
One typo in the instructions: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/reproduciblebuilds/settings → https://forge.fedoraproject.org/org/reproduciblebuilds/settings
Log in to comment on this ticket.