org.centos directly? That would be consistent with the other notifications sent by the centos infra

Aren't others used for testing/development only?

Aren't others used for testing/development only?

nope, the messages sent by centos-ci are all: org.centos.{prod,stage}...

An example: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/datagrepper/id?id=2020-255ec4db-7951-4e1b-81cc-7378c7ea15fe&is_raw=true&size=extra-large

org.centos is correct, I was misremembering the earlier prefixes

Just updated it to org.centos.{{ env_suffix }}.gitlab.#.

Just updated it to org.centos.{{ env_suffix }}.gitlab.#.

I was going to say that I would keep gitlab-centos, but I realize that if there
ever is a gitlab instance in fedora, it'll be prefixed by org.fedoraproject...

On the other side, keeping 'gitlab-centos' will make it be the category which
isn't taking into account the prefix (so if we have
org.fedoraproject.prod.gitlab and org.centos.prod.gitlab, both gitlab instances
would show when filtering messages in datagrepper for category = gitlab).

Has anyone thoughts on this?

I think it should be fine to just call it 'gitlab'... if we have things that filter and break, we should fix them. :)

I switched it to gitlab because org.centos.prod.gitlab-centos... didn't feel right since it is already "namespaced" in "org.centos..".

Would it be possible to filter "by source" as well in datanommer?

Would it be possible to filter "by source" as well in datanommer?

Not atm but that might be a worthwhile requirement for its replacement :)

Since there is a consensus, I'm going to rebase and merge this.

Do you want me to run the playbook to have the queue created on the rabbitmq server?

Yes, please :)