fedora-docs / websites

#16 Broken links in documentation section of main websites landing page
Closed: complete by thunderbirdtr. Opened by troycurtisjr.

Closed: complete
Reopen Issue

I was checking out the websites team docs, and ran across a broken link in this section https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/websites/#_documentation. Specifically the logic model link currently points here. I'm not sure exactly what the intention was, but perhaps it should be from the latest comment on the design team ticket. That would be this image. But perhaps instead of linking to another upload in comment it should actually be added into a more durable place, perhaps in this repo directly?

Additionally the community blog link is broken due to a little syntax error I missed in my PR earlier today.

I'm up for prepping a PR but just need an understanding from the team on:

  1. Which logic model image should be used?
  2. Should it be pulled into this repo, or is there some preferred location for assets to be hosted?

ah, perhaps we should link to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Objectives/Websites_%26_Apps_Community_Revamp ?

Also, I've noted this taiga card https://teams.fedoraproject.org/project/fedora-websites-apps-team/us/57?kanban-status=639 mentions settling on a bridged telegram and matrix channels. However, currently this websites team page has TBA on telegram and no mention of the matrix room.

Perhaps we also need to add a link to https://matrix.to/#/#fedora-websites:matrix.org ? Should we also mention the telegram channel? What is it?

Metadata Update from @thunderbirdtr:
- Issue assigned to thunderbirdtr

Metadata Update from @thunderbirdtr:
- Issue tagged with: type - existing docs

Hello @troycurtisjr, first of all thank your pointing out the problem you notice :thumbsup:

I decided to fill the gapps for you and I just fixed matrix and telegram and comm blog urls. I also changed revamp logic table url and point to wiki page picture, because "pagure" link is long and could be tricky but wiki link is manageable but we may move "revamp" page into our docs as well. So we don't need to use external url as you also mention and that would be so much better.

Thank you so much.

Metadata Update from @thunderbirdtr:
- Issue close_status updated to: complete
- Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)

Related commits ;

https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/websites/c/65b56ff145bd69bb854b95fde719cfbf7278e77f?branch=main

https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/websites/c/6f8665f942cf8d10f2d761054a2e556dc6b3eea5?branch=main
Metadata

type - existing docs

None
None
Static archive. pagure.io was sunset in 2026; this is a read-only snapshot.
Red Hat Logo

Fedora is sponsored by Red Hat. Learn more about the relationship between Red Hat and Fedora »

© Red Hat, Inc. and others.