A section on 'reviewers needed' is worth a review due to incremental improvements made in recent months. So we could reset our priorities beyond fixing wiki converted content, which I think it suits most experienced colleagues who know intricacies of AsciiDoc, but also partials/include directive put people off to contribute to Quick Docs in general. We need to make a balance because there are many things contributors can do other than dealing with wiki converted pages.

Could we split them down to a few pointers such as;
- Content fix
- technical review on pages converted from wiki (summarize current paragraph and make it relevant to current status of Quick Docs)
- Suggestions for new content and curation