From 9804d0b3ed5b01f37bc46f3ad65ccab3277de8ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ♪ I'm a bot, bot, bot ♪ <_update_docs_trans@sundries01.phx2.fedoraproject.org>
Date: May 22 2023 22:06:10 +0000
Subject: automatic update of pot/po files


---

diff --git a/pot/master/pages/Package_Review_Process.pot b/pot/master/pages/Package_Review_Process.pot
index d25d294..c8e648b 100644
--- a/pot/master/pages/Package_Review_Process.pot
+++ b/pot/master/pages/Package_Review_Process.pot
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 "Project-Id-Version: PACKAGE VERSION\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2023-01-04 22:03+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2023-05-22 21:58+0000\n"
 "PO-Revision-Date: YEAR-MO-DA HO:MI+ZONE\n"
 "Last-Translator: FULL NAME <EMAIL@ADDRESS>\n"
 "Language-Team: LANGUAGE <LL@li.org>\n"
@@ -137,14 +137,22 @@ msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:72
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:71
+msgid ""
+"If this is a \"re-review\" request needed to "
+"xref:Package_Retirement_Process.adoc#claiming[claim ownership] of a retired "
+"package, add `Unretirement` to the _Whiteboard_ field."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:75
 msgid ""
 "Wait for someone to review your package! At this point in the process, the "
 "`fedora-review` flag is blank, meaning that no reviewer is assigned."
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:83
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:86
 msgid ""
 "There may be comments from people that are not formally reviewing the "
 "package, they may add `NotReady` to the _Whiteboard_ field, indication that "
@@ -156,14 +164,14 @@ msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:86
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:89
 msgid ""
 "A reviewer takes on the task of reviewing your package.  They will set the "
 "`fedora-review` flag to `?`."
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:92
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:95
 msgid ""
 "The reviewer will review your package.  You should fix any blockers that the "
 "reviewer identifies.  Once the reviewer is happy with the package, the "
@@ -172,7 +180,7 @@ msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:95
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:98
 msgid ""
 "If you have not yet been sponsored, request sponsorship by "
 "https://pagure.io/packager-sponsors/issues[raising an issue at "
@@ -180,7 +188,7 @@ msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:102
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:105
 msgid ""
 "When your package passes the review you should use `fedpkg` to request a Git "
 "repository for it.  Before you can request a Git repository for the package, "
@@ -189,7 +197,7 @@ msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: delimited block .
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:106
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:109
 #, no-wrap
 msgid ""
 "[fedpkg.pagure]\n"
@@ -197,20 +205,20 @@ msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:112
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:115
 msgid ""
 "Request a Git repository for the package.  For example, if the package name "
 "is `my-package` and the bugzilla review ticket is 12345, :"
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: delimited block .
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:115
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:118
 #, no-wrap
 msgid "fedpkg request-repo my-package 12345\n"
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:121
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:124
 msgid ""
 "Check that your review bug is valid.  It must have the `fedora-review` set "
 "to `+`, and it must be assigned to your reviewer.  Otherwise your repository "
@@ -218,7 +226,7 @@ msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:126
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:129
 msgid ""
 "If you want to add your package to more Fedora releases and not just "
 "Rawhide, let's say to Fedora {MAJOROSVER}, you can use the following command "
@@ -226,13 +234,13 @@ msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: delimited block .
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:129
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:132
 #, no-wrap
 msgid "fedpkg request-branch --repo my-package f{MAJOROSVER}`\n"
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:134
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:137
 msgid ""
 "You do not need to wait for your repository to be created before filing your "
 "branch request, but you should request the repository before requesting "
@@ -240,7 +248,7 @@ msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:138
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:141
 msgid ""
 "When https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issues[fedora-scm-requests "
 "tickets] for the requested repository and branches are closed, checkout the "
@@ -248,13 +256,13 @@ msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: delimited block .
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:141
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:144
 #, no-wrap
 msgid "fedpkg clone\n"
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:145
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:148
 msgid ""
 "Now you can "
 "xref:New_Package_Process_for_New_Contributors.adoc#import_commit_and_build_your_package[import "
@@ -262,7 +270,7 @@ msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:148
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:151
 msgid ""
 "Request a Koji build by running `fedpkg build`.  (You will need to set up "
 "https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Kerberos[Kerberos for Fedora "
@@ -270,22 +278,22 @@ msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:150
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:153
 msgid "Repeat the process for other branches you may have requested above:"
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:151
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:154
 msgid "Checkout given branch: `fedpkg switch-branch f{MAJOROSVER}`"
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:152
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:155
 msgid "Let Koji build the package for this branch: `fedpkg build`"
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:156
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:159
 msgid ""
 "Request updates for Fedora release branches, if necessary, using `fedpkg "
 "update` or another Bodhi interface as detailed in "
@@ -293,14 +301,14 @@ msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:158
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:161
 msgid ""
 "If possible, add your package to "
 "xref:Upstream_Release_Monitoring.adoc[Upstream Release Monitoring]."
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:162
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:165
 msgid ""
 "To be notified if your package stops building successfully when dependencies "
 "are updated in Fedora, you can enable "
@@ -308,7 +316,7 @@ msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:170
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:173
 msgid ""
 "You should make sure the review ticket is closed.  You are welcome to close "
 "it once the package has been built on the requested branches.  If you built "
@@ -318,7 +326,7 @@ msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:175
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:178
 msgid ""
 "You do not need to go through the review process again for subsequent "
 "package changes, and should not reference the review ticket in subsequent "
@@ -326,18 +334,18 @@ msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Title ===
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:176
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:179
 #, no-wrap
 msgid "Reviewer"
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:179
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:182
 msgid "The Reviewer is the person who chooses to review a package."
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:185
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:188
 msgid ""
 "The Reviewer can be any Fedora account holder who is a member of the "
 "https://accounts.fedoraproject.org/group/packager/[packager group].  (If the "
@@ -346,7 +354,7 @@ msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:188
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:191
 msgid ""
 "Search http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/[Package Review Tracker] "
 "for a review request that needs a reviewer: `fedora-review` flag is blank or "
@@ -354,7 +362,7 @@ msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:195
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:198
 msgid ""
 "If you notice some issues that need to be solved before you want to start a "
 "formal review, add these issues in a comment and set the _Whiteboard_ of the "
@@ -363,58 +371,58 @@ msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:199
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:202
 msgid ""
 "If you want to formally review the package, set the `fedora-review` flag to "
 "`?` and assign the bug to yourself."
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:201
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:204
 msgid "Review the package"
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:203
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:206
 msgid ""
 "Go through the MUST items listed in "
 "xref:packaging-guidelines::ReviewGuidelines.adoc[Review Guidelines] ."
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:205
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:208
 msgid ""
 "Go through the SHOULD items in "
 "xref:packaging-guidelines::ReviewGuidelines.adoc[Review Guidelines] ."
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:209
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:212
 msgid ""
 "The https://pagure.io/FedoraReview[FedoraReview] tool (packaged as "
 "`fedora-review`)  can help to automate this process."
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:213
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:216
 msgid ""
 "Include the text of your review in a comment in the ticket.  For easy "
 "readability, simply use a regular comment instead of an attachment."
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:215
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:218
 msgid "Take one of the following actions:"
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:216
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:219
 #, no-wrap
 msgid "*ACCEPT* - If the package is good, set the `fedora-review` flag to `+`.\n"
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:224
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:227
 #, no-wrap
 msgid ""
 "*FAIL, LEGAL* - If the package is legally risky for whatever reason\n"
@@ -428,7 +436,7 @@ msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:233
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:236
 #, no-wrap
 msgid ""
 "*FAIL, OTHER* - If the package is just way off\n"
@@ -442,7 +450,7 @@ msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:240
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:243
 #, no-wrap
 msgid ""
 "*NEEDSWORK* - Anything that isn't explicitly failed should be left open\n"
@@ -455,7 +463,7 @@ msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:247
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:250
 msgid ""
 "Once a package is flagged as `fedora-review +` (or `-`), the Reviewer's job "
 "is done although they may be called upon to assist the Contributor with the "
@@ -464,13 +472,13 @@ msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Title ==
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:249
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:252
 #, no-wrap
 msgid "Definitions for fedora-review flag Settings"
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Table
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:257
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:260
 #, no-wrap
 msgid ""
 "|fedora-review |(BLANK) |Package Needs Review\n"
@@ -481,20 +489,20 @@ msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Title ==
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:260
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:263
 #, no-wrap
 msgid "Special blocker tickets"
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:264
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:267
 msgid ""
 "There are a few tickets which can be placed in the \"Blocks\" field to "
 "indicate specific ticket statuses:"
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Table
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:270
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:273
 #, no-wrap
 msgid ""
 "|FE-NEEDSPONSOR |The submitter requires a sponsor; the review can be done by "
@@ -506,13 +514,13 @@ msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Title ==
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:273
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:276
 #, no-wrap
 msgid "The Whiteboard"
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:282
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:285
 msgid ""
 "To save time for reviewers, the "
 "https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/reviewable.html[New, "
@@ -523,7 +531,7 @@ msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Table
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:289
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:293
 #, no-wrap
 msgid ""
 "|NotReady |The package is not yet ready for review. It is possible to open a "
@@ -533,10 +541,13 @@ msgid ""
 "|AwaitingSubmitter |The package review is stalled and cannot proceed without "
 "input from the submitter.\n"
 "|Trivial |The package is trivial to review. See below.\n"
+"|Unretirement |A re-review needed to "
+"xref:Package_Retirement_Process.adoc#claiming[claim ownership] of a retired "
+"package .\n"
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:295
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:299
 msgid ""
 "The `Trivial` status is intended to indicate packages which, as an aid to "
 "new reviewers, are especially uncomplicated and easy to review.  A ticket "
@@ -544,66 +555,66 @@ msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:298
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:302
 msgid "The package is known to build and a link to a scratch build is included."
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:300
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:304
 msgid "The ticket explains any rpmlint output which is present."
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:303
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:307
 msgid ""
 "The spec contains nothing which is unnecessary in modern Fedora (such as "
 "`BuildRoot:`, a `%clean` section or `%defattr`)."
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:305
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:309
 msgid "The spec is free from excessive or complicated macro usage."
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:308
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:312
 msgid ""
 "The spec uses only the least complicated scriptlets which are taken directly "
 "from the xref:packaging-guidelines::Scriptlets.adoc[Scriptlets] page."
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:310
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:314
 msgid "The package contains no daemons."
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:312
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:316
 msgid "The package is not especially security sensitive."
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:315
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:319
 msgid ""
 "The code has undergone a thorough inspection for licensing issues.  "
 "Anomalies which would be found by `licensecheck` should be explained."
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:319
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:323
 msgid ""
 "In short, this should be reserved only for those tickets which should be "
 "easily approachable by someone doing their first package review."
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Title ==
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:321
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:325
 #, no-wrap
 msgid "Tracking of Package Requests"
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:325
+#: ./pages/Package_Review_Process.adoc:329
 msgid ""
 "The http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus[Package Review Tracker] "
 "provides various review-related reports and a simple way to search for "
diff --git a/pot/master/pages/index.pot b/pot/master/pages/index.pot
index c8f82f4..fbf28d1 100644
--- a/pot/master/pages/index.pot
+++ b/pot/master/pages/index.pot
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 "Project-Id-Version: PACKAGE VERSION\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2023-01-04 22:03+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2023-05-22 21:58+0000\n"
 "PO-Revision-Date: YEAR-MO-DA HO:MI+ZONE\n"
 "Last-Translator: FULL NAME <EMAIL@ADDRESS>\n"
 "Language-Team: LANGUAGE <LL@li.org>\n"
@@ -106,8 +106,8 @@ msgstr ""
 #. type: Plain text
 #: ./pages/index.adoc:43
 msgid ""
-"http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/html/RPM_Guide/index.html[RPM "
-"Guide] — an in-depth guide to RPM."
+"https://rpm-packaging-guide.github.io/[RPM Packaging Guide] — an in-depth "
+"guide to RPM."
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Title ===