#348 Move grubby and grubby-deprecated from @core to @arm-tools
Merged 5 years ago by adamwill. Opened 5 years ago by adamwill.
adamwill/fedora-comps no-grubby-core  into  master

file modified
+2 -2
@@ -157,6 +157,8 @@ 

      <packagelist>

        <packagereq>arm-image-installer</packagereq>

        <packagereq>cloud-utils-growpart</packagereq>

+       <packagereq>grubby</packagereq>

+       <packagereq>grubby-deprecated</packagereq>

        <packagereq>uboot-images-armv7</packagereq>

        <packagereq>uboot-images-armv8</packagereq>

        <packagereq>zram</packagereq>
@@ -753,8 +755,6 @@ 

        <packagereq type="default">dnf-plugins-core</packagereq>

        <packagereq type="default">dracut-config-rescue</packagereq>

        <packagereq type="default">firewalld</packagereq>

-       <packagereq type="default">grubby</packagereq>

-       <packagereq type="default">grubby-deprecated</packagereq>

        <packagereq type="default">lsvpd</packagereq>

        <packagereq type="default">NetworkManager</packagereq>

        <packagereq type="default">powerpc-utils</packagereq>

Adding them into @core was supposed to make them show up in some
install trees, according to the commit message, but it broke
regular BLS installs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1654036

which is obviously a major problem. I think moving the entries
to arm-tools should ensure the packages are in the relevant trees
without breaking BLS installs.

Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson awilliam@redhat.com

@nirik said "seems worth trying, sure", seems like no-one else is around right now. I'm just gonna merge it and we can see how the next compose goes.

Pull-Request has been merged by adamwill

5 years ago

@adamwill probably just needed grubby-deprecated to arm-tools, and the original grubby should go back to where it was

I am mostly certain that @pbrobinson is right. But LGTM.

Metadata