PR#182: Drop fedora-release-notes from the @standard group - fedora-comps

fedora-comps

#182 Drop fedora-release-notes from the @standard group

Merged 6 years ago by adamwill. Opened 6 years ago by sgallagh.

sgallagh/fedora-comps relnotes into master

Drop fedora-release-notes from the @standard group

Stephen Gallagher • 6 years ago

e28f12e

comps-f27.xml.in

file modified

-1

		`@@ -5845,7 +5845,6 @@`
		`<packagereq>dosfstools</packagereq>`
		`<packagereq>ed</packagereq>`
		`<packagereq>ethtool</packagereq>`
		`- <packagereq>fedora-release-notes</packagereq>`
		`<packagereq>file</packagereq>`
		`<packagereq>fpaste</packagereq>`
		`<packagereq>fprintd-pam</packagereq>`

comps-f28.xml.in

file modified

-1

		`@@ -5804,7 +5804,6 @@`
		`<packagereq>dosfstools</packagereq>`
		`<packagereq>ed</packagereq>`
		`<packagereq>ethtool</packagereq>`
		`- <packagereq>fedora-release-notes</packagereq>`
		`<packagereq>file</packagereq>`
		`<packagereq>fpaste</packagereq>`
		`<packagereq>fprintd-pam</packagereq>`

sgallagh commented 6 years ago

As discussed during the Go/No-Go meeting today, we don't need or want the release notes on the install media (to avoid blocking the creation of release candidates).

Signed-off-by: Stephen Gallagher sgallagh@redhat.com

mattdm commented 6 years ago

+1 -- looks right, and I think it's the right thing to do.

adamwill commented 6 years ago

This is fine if we want to do it, but it's not sufficient to cut a release, I don't believe. We would still have the outdated notes in the Everything tree unless we block or retire the package. I'd say that we must either retire, block or update the package so that it does not contain release notes for an old release, as well as / instead of doing this.

adamwill commented 6 years ago

OK, we're going with merging this and retiring the package.