These metrics were first proposed by @jflory7 on #105 for GSoC metrics project. However, as it is not yet clear if this metrics will be included in the final deliverables or if the project will get a slot for GSoC 2017, I am creating a new issue for this.
Some statistics to be collected on the Fedora Magazine / Community Blog via the WordPress API could be cool. Specifically, we would want to gain insight into:
Post performance (daily / weekly / monthly) Overall trends in viewing (weekly / monthly / annually) Comparative reports (e.g. how this {week,month,year} was compared to last {week,month,year}
Adding @pfrields and @ryanlerch too, since they might have ideas for "Fedora Magazine metric wishlist" to throw into the ring.
Metadata Update from @bee2502: - Issue marked as blocking: #105 - Issue priority set to: no deadline - Issue set to the milestone: Future releases - Issue tagged with: GSoC, community blog, help wanted, metrics
Metadata Update from @bee2502: - Issue marked as depending on: #105 - Issue tagged with: blocked, needs feedback
Metadata Update from @bee2502: - Issue untagged with: help wanted
Metadata Update from @skamath: - Issue assigned to skamath
Metadata Update from @skamath: - Issue untagged with: GSoC
Metadata Update from @skamath: - Issue unmarked as blocking: #105 - Issue unmarked as depending on: #105 - Issue marked as depending on: #114 - Issue priority set to: None (was: no deadline)
@skamath @dhanesh95 In today's meeting, we talked about the WordPress REST API as a way to accomplish this. Do both of you think it's a realistic goal to work towards at our FAD?
@jflory7 @skamath We may require more than one 'FAD' to accomplish our final goal. If that is acceptable, then we can break this ticket down into multiple modules and work on a specific set of modules in our upcoming FAD.
Thoughts?
@dhanesh95 I am +1 to dividing this ticket into smaller milestones and identifying critical ones for the FAD; could you lead the effort on rounding this up?
We can research and learn now what this task looks like and what effort it requires. At the FAD, we can advance on implementing it and get feedback from others.
@jflory7 Sure. I'll break it down into smaller milestones and reply here once done. Just one question - the description of this ticket mentions everything that needs to be achieved, right?
Metadata Update from @dhanesh95: - Issue assigned to dhanesh95 (was: skamath)
Discussed during 2017-12-11 meeting.
@dhanesh95 noted some difficulties of what data is available to us via the WordPress REST API (especially with article statistics, like view count). He is going to reach out to the Fedora Magazine team before next week's meeting to get their feedback on helpful data / metrics we could collect, based on the info we have now with the REST API.
Adding this to our meeting agenda for follow-up next week.
Metadata Update from @jflory7: - Issue untagged with: blocked, needs feedback - Issue priority set to: normal (1-2 weeks) - Issue set to the milestone: Fedora 28 (to May 2018) (was: Future releases) - Issue tagged with: meeting
Discussed in 2017-12-18 meeting.
This ticket is pending the previous action item noted above. We decided in the meeting that @dhanesh95 can add this ticket back to the meeting agenda when he needs feedback from the team or wants to have a group discussion.
Metadata Update from @jflory7: - Issue untagged with: meeting
The Jetpack statistics engine, provided by WordPress, already yields a number of metrics including the ones noted in this ticket. I don't think we should duplicate that functionality in yet another codebase. Can someone explain how this concept differs substantially?
@pfrields Comment-ninja'd. I replied to the Magazine mailing list post with some background a minute ago, but will repeat on this ticket too, so the motivation is better documented.
The specific goal is look into fedmsg integration via the WordPress REST API. Ideally, this allows us to automate the creation of helpful, insightful metrics about the performance of the Magazine, both to help the editing team and also help other teams in Fedora understand what our user base is interested and engaged in.
For example, I'd be interested in seeing our best-performing categories and tags, to help evaluate key interest areas. Other ideas are the usual metrics @ryanlerch and you put together at the end of the year. By building fedmsg integration, this also allows us to incorporate the Magazine into a GrimoireLabs dashboard (more info in #114).
It would be helpful to have the "metrics wishlist" either as a comment in the ticket linked above, or to be listed here on the mailing list. This will support one of the discussion topics at the CommOps FAD at the end of the month.
This makes a little more sense. I wanted to ensure we're not re-implementing what we already get for free. :wink: Typically we are focused on pageview metrics. Per tag may be tricky because I don't think we're consistent about that. Categories are more consistent and hopefully stats would be more accurate there.
@dhanesh95 noted some difficulties of what data is available to us via the WordPress REST API (especially with article statistics, like view count).
Linking the correct WordPress REST API documentation here:
https://developer.wordpress.com/docs/api/
Discussed in CommOps 2018 FAD
We decided to target only the WordPress platform given that we have a lot of other tasks on our plate. We discussed the end goals and the ways we can achieve them.
P.S: I also came across Huginn which is an Open Source alternative to the popular IFTTT service.
Metadata Update from @jflory7: - Issue tagged with: FAD
Discussed in 2018-03-19 meeting.
@dhanesh95 is finishing research on options above to put together a final proposal to move forward with the integration by our next meeting on Monday, March 26, 2018.
Huginn may enable us to implement fedmsg support for WordPress without writing our own plugin. This may be a part of the proposal depending on what @dhanesh95 finds this week.
Metadata Update from @jflory7: - Issue tagged with: help wanted, meeting
Metadata Update from @jflory7: - Issue untagged with: meeting - Issue priority set to: minor (3-4 weeks) (was: normal (1-2 weeks))
This issue is tagged for completion during the Fedora 28 (F28) milestone. The F28 milestone ends on Tuesday, May 1, 2018. This issue will be bumped to a future release cycle.
Metadata Update from @jflory7: - Issue priority set to: no deadline (was: minor (3-4 weeks)) - Issue set to the milestone: Fedora 29 (to Oct. 2018) (was: Fedora 28 (to May 2018))
Metadata Update from @jflory7: - Issue set to the milestone: Future releases (was: Fedora 29 (to Oct. 2018))
After a long time, I made some progress on studying how Huginn works and if it will help us achieve the goals we had set. Sorry for the delay.
Goals Insights into what users are interested in and looking for Help technical teams in Fedora measure impact of their work Drive marketing focus towards areas of strong engagement (supporting Mindshare) Writers / editors: Provides helpful feedback to change or continue messaging that's successful Assist editing teams of Mag / CommBlog in focusing content in a specific direction Grow community of writers to the Fedora Project More easily game-ifies a significant area of contribution Encourage healthy contributions Keep up the enthusiasm
Goals
Insights into what users are interested in and looking for Help technical teams in Fedora measure impact of their work Drive marketing focus towards areas of strong engagement (supporting Mindshare)
Writers / editors: Provides helpful feedback to change or continue messaging that's successful Assist editing teams of Mag / CommBlog in focusing content in a specific direction Grow community of writers to the Fedora Project
More easily game-ifies a significant area of contribution Encourage healthy contributions Keep up the enthusiasm
Considering all the observations, the following approach to implementation, probably not the best, could prove to be easiest and the fastest.
To implement this approach we may need a server to run the middleware. I'm unaware of the process to request for a cloud instance from Infra or even requesting one is at all possible. Maybe @jflory7 can shed some light here.
This may not be the best approach to tackle this ticket and I'm open to more suggestions on how we can make this better. If anyone here has any prior experience with Wordpress development, it would be great to hear their thoughts too.
Cheers!
Metadata Update from @jflory7: - Issue untagged with: type - FAD - Issue tagged with: team - commops
Hi @dhanesh95, thanks for putting in the research work. I am CCing others ( @bex @kevin @pfrields @ryanlerch @puiterwijk ) for their Infrastructure / Design input and the best process to follow.
@dhanesh95 said… This may not be the best approach to tackle this ticket and I'm open to more suggestions on how we can make this better. If anyone here has any prior experience with Wordpress development, it would be great to hear their thoughts too.
Some of these areas are outside my area of expertise, but I hope one of the CC'd folks can review this proposal and offer more feedback: https://pagure.io/fedora-commops/issue/108#comment-520486
@dhanesh95 said… 2. Create new child theme and write custom functions
This step seems trivial, since we already have a custom theme, fedora-communityblog.
@dhanesh95 said… 3. Write a custom middleware (mostly in Python) To implement this approach we may need a server to run the middleware. I'm unaware of the process to request for a cloud instance from Infra or even requesting one is at all possible. Maybe @jflory7 can shed some light here.
There is a process to request an unofficial cloud instance for hosting things like this. However, its trajectory also depends if we would want it to live in the Fedora production environment or in a cloud instance. I feel like it makes more sense to put in the effort to set it up and run in production, if possible.
Metadata Update from @jflory7: - Issue priority set to: waiting on assignee (was: waiting on external)
So, a couple of things I'd like to note here...
I am not sure how much sense it makes to fedmsg enable metrics. We would need to be very careful to anonymize them (which is difficult to do) and if there's really only a metrics dashboard or the like operating on them, having tons of metrics fedmsgs seems like a waste.
I see that jetpack has plugins/a plugin framework. Perhaps thats worth looking into rather than an new big app?
Finally, our openshift setup is coming along nicely, and I am not sure how much @puiterwijk would scream, but we could think about moving magazine and community blog into openshift from the infra private cloud. The reason I mention that is that then we could use the built into openshift metrics, which are pretty complex and nice (but I am not 100% clear on what you need). Note that we only have that setup in staging yet and it still needs persistent storage, but hopefully that will happen after beta.
Metadata Update from @jflory7: - Issue tagged with: type - coding
Metadata Update from @jflory7: - Issue priority set to: next meeting (was: waiting on assignee)
When @dhanesh95 has time to look into this next, we'll bring it back up on the meeting agenda.
Metadata Update from @jflory7: - Issue priority set to: waiting on assignee (was: next meeting)
Metadata Update from @dhanesh95: - Issue priority set to: next meeting (was: waiting on assignee)
Metadata Update from @jflory7: - Issue set to the milestone: None (was: Future releases)
Unfortunately, there has been no progress on this ticket since my last comment more than a year ago. The past year has been busy and I don't see the situation changing anytime soon. As a result, I'm dropping this ticket and I encourage current active members of CommOps to take it up.
Metadata Update from @dhanesh95: - Assignee reset
Discussed in 2020-08-08 Fedora Nest metrics hack session.
We decided to close this ticket as stale, given the three years of attempts on this ticket. We could all agree it is a super idea and would be great to have, but CommOps does not have the resources to pull this work off.
stale
If this work really is valuable and worthwhile, one possible way forward would be to drive this at the Fedora Council level and work to identify engineering talent inside Red Hat that might be interested in helping lead this.
But for now, someone else will have to pick up the torch. We are going to move on to new things and let this one go.
Metadata Update from @jflory7: - Issue close_status updated to: Stale - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
Log in to comment on this ticket.