#646 Module Builder
Closed: stale a year ago by riecatnor. Opened 5 years ago by riecatnor.

Badge description (like "You added a co-maintainer to a package. BFF!"):
- You built "XYZ" amount of modules!

-This idea generated at Flock lightning talks 2018. Make a series similar to this -> https://badges.fedoraproject.org/badge/building-the-outer-ring-copr-build-i but for module builds. Feel free to provide more relevant information as I was given simply one line about the idea :)

Help the badges team understand what this idea is all about. If this badge is
awarded for certain kinds of activities:

1) What are those activities?
- Building modules

2) Who is doing them (are they packagers? translators? newcomers? veterans?
users? sponsors?)
- developers

3) Why are they doing them (is this a means to a different end?)
- AFAIK, they do them to allow different versions of software languages to run/work co-currently

4) When do they do them (every day? once a year?)
- ?? Unclear to me. Please feel free to edit this field.

5) How do they do them (by talking in IRC? by running commands in the console?
by using a web interface?)
- console

Lastly, do you have any ideas for artwork concepts?
- Maybe remix the artwork for the member badge.. adding more blocks as the numbering increases
https://badges.fedoraproject.org/badge/modularity-wg-member


We have a fedmsg for this, right?

Metadata Update from @sayanchowdhury:
- Custom field artwork adjusted to None
- Custom field concept_review_passed adjusted to None

5 years ago

Metadata Update from @riecatnor:
- Issue tagged with: artwork-intermediate, artwork-needed, development

5 years ago

@riecatnor do you know what the numbering could be? 1-10-50-100? Or smaller?
Who can be the contact person to ask questions - who did you talk to?
Thanks :)

Metadata Update from @mleonova:
- Issue assigned to mleonova

5 years ago

@mleonova great start! I think the artwork is missing some contrast... all the colors are gorgeous, but all very bright and saturated. Try making the background a bit lighter? Also, could be nice to have the bricks be two different colors. What does the arrow represent?

Metadata Update from @riecatnor:
- Custom field artwork adjusted to has_draft (was: None)

4 years ago

Metadata Update from @riecatnor:
- Issue tagged with: artwork-needs-improvement, outreachy-2020

4 years ago

Hi, @riecatnor I am willing to contribute in this badge. I have a concept in mind can we discuss?

Metadata Update from @riecatnor:
- Issue assigned to nimrafayyaz (was: mleonova)

4 years ago

@nimrafayyaz this is a great start! Something important to keep in mind is that the badges are usually always viewed at a small size, so we want to keep things as simple as we can while getting the message across. I would say its best to make the focus the panda or the blocks, make sense? The panda is more interesting to me, I think you can play up it's construction look.

Here are some improvements I would suggest
- remove "module" and "modules", the description of the badge will be enough to describe that it is about modules
- move the number to the upper right hand side
- make the panda bigger
- give the hard hat a stroke of 1.5 pixel or greater
- plump up the pandas arms
- I really like the blocks used here, maybe try to incorporate those:
https://badges.fedoraproject.org/badge/modularity-wg-member

I look forward to the next draft! Thanks :)

Thanks @riecatnor for the suggestions. I will follow these and back with new draft soon :)

Hi @nimrafayyaz I like the improvements! Here are a couple more thoughts

  • The panda is still looking a little slim, see this badge https://badges.fedoraproject.org/badge/neurofedora-sig-member see how wide it's arms are?
  • I actually don't love the way those blocks are looking in there, what do you think? Maybe it would be better to go back to your version. Make sure to add a nice stroke on them to match your panda :)
  • Make sure to upload SVGs, I often look at them

Good luck :)

It seems you have pasted wrong refrence link of badge @riecatnor

Hi @nimrafayyaz hmm, sorry for the wrong link (as much as cats on foil is great). I meant this one: https://badges.fedoraproject.org/badge/neurofedora-sig-member

A couple notes:
- I think a white stroke is unnecessary here. Not sure which badge you are referencing for that.
- The panda still needs BULK hahah. Check out the link I sent. Do you see what I mean? If not, I can demonstrate :)
- The numbering looks good for now
- The blocks, hmmmm. I would like to seem them without a white stroke.

Thanks!

@nimrafayyaz ahh, I see. If you like the text better, I think it should go in place of the panda, similar to the the badge you referenced. That badge has just the text and one graphic.

Would it be ok if I demonstrated what I mean for the panda?

Thanks!

@riecatnor thanks for your suggestions. So are we going with only two graphics Blocks and text ? Is that so ?
and I don't get what are you talking about panda can you demonstrate ?

looking cool. But I think panda is little more bulk. What do you say ?

Metadata Update from @smeragoel:
- Assignee reset

2 years ago

Metadata Update from @smeragoel:
- Issue untagged with: artwork - needed

2 years ago

Issue tagged with: AW: needed

2 years ago

I am triaging the badges queue, closing this ticket as stale. If there is renewed interest, please feel free to reopen!

Metadata Update from @riecatnor:
- Issue close_status updated to: stale
- Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)

a year ago

Login to comment on this ticket.

Metadata
Boards 1
Artwork Status: In Progress
Attachments 23
Attached 5 years ago View Comment
Attached 4 years ago View Comment
Attached 4 years ago View Comment
Attached 4 years ago View Comment
Attached 4 years ago View Comment
Attached 4 years ago View Comment
Attached 4 years ago View Comment
Attached 4 years ago View Comment
Attached 4 years ago View Comment
Attached 4 years ago View Comment
Attached 4 years ago View Comment
Attached 4 years ago View Comment
Attached 4 years ago View Comment
Attached 4 years ago View Comment
Attached 4 years ago View Comment
Attached 4 years ago View Comment
Attached 4 years ago View Comment
Attached 4 years ago View Comment
Attached 4 years ago View Comment
Attached 4 years ago View Comment
Attached 4 years ago View Comment
Attached 4 years ago View Comment
Attached 4 years ago View Comment