What the badge should be granted for: - for new members and contributors of Fedora MATE-Compiz Spin
Badge description (like "You added a co-maintainer to a package. BFF!"): - Now a proud member of the Fedora MATE-Compiz
Anything else we need to know:
attachment mate-sig.svg
attachment <img alt="mate-sig.png" src="//issue/raw/files/87a360712219449f74ce5174efb6991e6fcc3099b7da834cc9505e5b3e878d4d-mate-sig.png" />
attachment <img alt="mate-sig.png" src="https://pagure.io/Fedora-Badges/issue/raw/files/87a360712219449f74ce5174efb6991e6fcc3099b7da834cc9505e5b3e878d4d-mate-sig.png" />
looks great! artwork approved
So, I'm pretty sure that membership in these SIGs is loosely defined and can't be done automatically (for instance, there is a FAS group for gitfedora-mate, but nothing for xfce).
In order to create these, we would need someone (or a few people) from each SIG to step up and volunteer to take ownership of the badge. They could then award it to the other people currently in the SIG and to newcomers in the future.
I couldn't find a mailing list for this SIG where I could ask people.
But I did find a gitfedora-mate group we could use.
If anyone from the mate sig happens across this note and has ideas about how this badge should be awarded, please chime in.
Metadata Update from @riecatnor: - Custom field artwork adjusted to approved - Custom field concept_review_passed adjusted to None (was: 0) - Custom field has_complete_yaml reset (from Not yet possible) - Custom field has_description adjusted to on (was: 1) - Custom field has_name adjusted to on (was: 1) - Custom field needs_manual_award reset (from 0) - Custom field triaged reset (from 0) - Issue close_status updated to: None
Metadata Update from @riecatnor: - Custom field has_complete_yaml reset (from false) - Custom field needs_manual_award reset (from false) - Custom field triaged reset (from false) - Issue tagged with: artwork-approved, community
I dropped a mail to @raveit65 asking for update on this ticket and course for this ticket.
Metadata Update from @sayanchowdhury: - Custom field has_complete_yaml reset (from false) - Custom field needs_manual_award reset (from false) - Custom field triaged reset (from false)
Metadata Update from @sayanchowdhury: - Custom field has_complete_yaml reset (from false) - Custom field needs_manual_award reset (from false) - Custom field triaged reset (from false) - Issue tagged with: not-yet-possible
I have no idea about this ticket and for what is good for. Can i close it?
Sure, I will go ahead and close this issue.
Metadata Update from @sayanchowdhury: - Custom field has_complete_yaml reset (from false) - Custom field needs_manual_award reset (from false) - Custom field triaged reset (from false) - Issue close_status updated to: no longer relevant - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
Login to comment on this ticket.