#1262 Moving CRL configuration to database
Closed: migrated 2 years ago by dmoluguw. Opened 7 years ago by edewata.

Currently the CRL generation is only done by the master and there can be only a single master in the whole system. If the master becomes unavailable, another replica will have to be promoted to become a new master.

Currently the process has to be done manually on both master and replica's configuration files. On IPA this involves updating:

  • CRL cache configuration (i.e. ca.crl.MasterCRL.enableCRLCache and ca.crl.MasterCRL.enableCRLUpdates in CS.cfg)
  • CRL generation/delegation configuration (i.e. RewriteRule in ipa-pki-proxy.conf)

See: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Howto/Promote_CA_to_Renewal_and_CRL_Master

Proposed solution: The above file-based configuration should be moved into database so it's no longer necessary to access each server directly. Each server will have a corresponding configuration in the database. The migration can happen during server startup time. Replica promotion will be done by changing the configuration in the database for the old master and for the new replica. The servers should listen for changes on its own configuration (e.g. using persistent search). When a change is detected, the server should enable/disable the cache or generate CRL/delegate CRL generation according to the new configuration in the database. There should be an interface (e.g. CLI) to manage the configuration in the database. The installer should add the initial entries in the database. The old configuration parameters in CS.cfg and ipa-pki-proxy.conf should be removed with an upgrade script.

An alternate solution is discussed in ticket #1259.

Proposed milestone: 10.3


This is the short term solution for the FreeIPA seamless CRL master handling. It can be done in earlier release than #1259.

Per CS/DS meeting of 02/16/2015: 10.3

Metadata Update from @edewata:
- Issue set to the milestone: UNTRIAGED

5 years ago

Metadata Update from @ftweedal:
- Custom field blockedby adjusted to https://pagure.io/dogtagpki/issue/2586
- Custom field feature adjusted to None
- Custom field proposedmilestone adjusted to None
- Custom field proposedpriority adjusted to None
- Custom field reviewer adjusted to None
- Custom field version adjusted to None
- Issue close_status updated to: None

3 years ago

Metadata Update from @ftweedal:
- Custom field blockedby reset (from https://pagure.io/dogtagpki/issue/2586)

3 years ago

Dogtag PKI is moving from Pagure issues to GitHub issues. This means that existing or new
issues will be reported and tracked through Dogtag PKI's GitHub Issue tracker.

This issue has been cloned to GitHub and is available here:
https://github.com/dogtagpki/pki/issues/1824

If you want to receive further updates on the issue, please navigate to the
GitHub issue and click on Subscribe button.

Thank you for understanding, and we apologize for any inconvenience.

Metadata Update from @dmoluguw:
- Issue close_status updated to: migrated
- Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)

2 years ago

Login to comment on this ticket.

Metadata