Learn more about these different git repos.
Other Git URLs
the project has been un-maintained for a while now I've decided to take it over again would like to start working on it. I've created a rough mockup of the UI and would want it to be verified by fedora design team before i start working on it. <img alt="Fedora_gooey_karma-mockup.jpg" src="/design/issue/raw/files/0363ac7d65d4485726acc70fd88c8451e89f8cb44702f107aef2afbe98d2d25a-Fedora_gooey_karma-mockup.jpg" /> I would like to know about the usable fonts and looking for any changes to be made in the mockup thank you
@imzubin Hey, this is showing the available packages tab, right? What is shown under installed pacakges? I'm guessing it would only show test packages that are already installed on the system?
@imzubin this is my first attempt - I looked at the KDE HIG as well as Bodhi's layout and metadata for submitting karma, so that the design would be consistent with both. It's my understanding that the KDE HIG dictates Noto Sans as the font, however, I do not know if Fedora KDE overrides that with the default Fedora font Cantarell and am waiting for some more information about that from the KDE SIG.
<img alt="gooeykarma-mockup1.png" src="/design/issue/raw/files/3fd1a7a9a9265c391b879881f180431a3d1efdce37d69f48d20a7bf0a9cf29e4-gooeykarma-mockup1.png" />
Questions I still have:
Some notes for the next pass:
okay, the mockup looks awesome. 1. the installed packages would be showing the packages that have been already installed on the machine, thinking about it now I think that we don't really need multiple tabs for that, a simple checkbox in the dropdown should be able to do the job. 2. yeah, it's kinda alternative of fedora easy karma as it would allow users to look at the installed packages and packages that they can install, I'll be adding installing and uninstalling feature as well. 3. yes, it was supposed to be the same thing,
instead of showing all the comments we can simply add a link to comments.
i think the different test cases have different karmas, I added it so we can keep a count on the voted karmas.
@imzubin
@sumantrom please look into the thread and correct us if needed.
so, i had a word with @sumantrom, and we decided that
rest is fine.
Hey Zubin, everything else looks good. Thanks a lot Mo for those beautiful designs!! :)
On Sun, Apr 28, 2019, 17:37 Zubin choudhary pagure@pagure.io wrote:
imzubin added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` so, i had a word with @sumantrom, and we decided that this package is not for installation and un-installation of packages in the testers machine, this package will only allow to post karmas for the test packages. We'll have to link the testcases to the wiki pages, testcase description as a link would be nice for that functionality. comparing it to bodhi website, in case of internet issues the package would store the karmas and post it when the connection is available user doesn't need to know what another user rates the package and comments on it, so no we don't need to include comments rest is fine. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/design/issue/633
imzubin added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` so, i had a word with @sumantrom, and we decided that
rest is fine. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/design/issue/633
Metadata Update from @duffy: - Issue tagged with: triaged
Metadata Update from @imzubin: - Issue close_status updated to: Fixed - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
hey, sorry for reopening the issue again, but after getting a feedback on the project repo, we do have a couple of changes in the mock-up.
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/fedora-gooey-karma/issue/7
additions: related packages (depended packages) comments Removal : available packages tab. packages from previous fedora versions
can you please provide a revised mock-up. thank you.
Metadata Update from @imzubin: - Issue status updated to: Open (was: Closed)
@imzubin this totally fell off my radar, my deep apologies! is an updated mockup still useful at this point?
not really, I'm not being able to replicate a lot of details in Qt framework anyway.
On Tue, 16 Jul, 2019, 11:41 PM M=C3=A1ir=C3=ADn Duffy, pagure@pagure.io w= rote:
duffy added a new comment to an issue you are following: @imzubin this totally fell off my radar, my deep apologies! is an updated mockup still useful at this point? To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/design/issue/633
duffy added a new comment to an issue you are following: @imzubin this totally fell off my radar, my deep apologies! is an updated mockup still useful at this point?
Gooey karma is now unmaintained so we're closing this.
Metadata Update from @duckution: - Issue close_status updated to: Invalid - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
Login to comment on this ticket.