#704 Update the "How to release Copr" document
Closed 4 years ago by praiskup. Opened 4 years ago by frostyx.
copr/ frostyx/copr update-how-to-release-copr-2  into  master

file modified
+4 -3
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ 

  

      sudo su - copr-fe

  

-     alembic upgrade head

+     alembic-3 upgrade head

  

  Note: If there is a new version of copr-rpmbuild, run this on backend::

  
@@ -57,7 +57,8 @@ 

  Call for QA

  -----------

  

- Move MODIFIED+ bugzillas to ON_QA.

+ Move `MODIFIED+ <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=POST&bug_status=MODIFIED&product=Copr>`_

+ bugzillas to ON_QA.

  

  Ask people to test, verify bugs, and generally help with QA. They will ignore it but you will feel good about giving them a chance.

  
@@ -76,7 +77,7 @@ 

      version=<current_pkg_version> python3 setup.py sdist

      twine upload dist/<NAME-VERSION>.tar.gz

  

- Substitute `<current_pkg_version>` with the current package version.

+ Substitute `<current_pkg_version>` with the current package version (without release).

  

  If you cannot run that, tell somebody with access to run that (msuchy has access).

  

Just an ordinary post-release update of "How to release Copr" document.

I'm not sure this deserves attention and it slightly sounds like a configuration issue.
f28 is soon to die, and documenting legacy ... up to you.

What about - while we are on it - instruct maintainers to move the bugs to CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE directly?

We can't close the bugs yet. In this phase, only dev instance is updated and the production instance is still untouched. We could possibly skip this step and just close the bugs in "Post release" section but I think, that it is a good idea to give people a chance to test our fixes on devel instance. I think, that we should have a nice template, saying that the fix is deployed to the devel instance, that could be copy-pasted to the BZs.

3 new commits added

  • [doc] use version without release number for PyPI
  • [doc] add a link to MODIFIED bugzillas
  • [doc] use alembic-3 command instead of alembic
4 years ago

can we use this? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=POST&bug_status=MODIFIED&product=Copr

We can :-)

I'm not sure this deserves attention and it slightly sounds like a configuration issue.
f28 is soon to die, and documenting legacy ... up to you.

True, I've removed the commit

Unable to rebase again, pushed as 2d1fd82

Pull-Request has been closed by praiskup

4 years ago
Metadata