Learn more about these different git repos.
Other Git URLs
I was doing a package review (RHBZ 2054410) and fedora-review tool produced
fedora-review
Rpmlint ------- Cannot parse rpmlint output: Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- Cannot parse rpmlint output:
But locally, when running fedora-review -b 2054410, I got
fedora-review -b 2054410
Rpmlint ------- Cannot parse rpmlint output: Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.2.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 1 shdoc.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary shdoc 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.0 s
Metadata Update from @praiskup: - Issue tagged with: bug
Metadata Update from @praiskup: - Issue assigned to nikromen
notes for me: - the first Cannot parse rpmlint output seems to be bug in fedora-review -> create an issue there (firstly investigate similat bug https://pagure.io/FedoraReview/issue/425) - second rpmlint error seems to be an error on our side
Cannot parse rpmlint output
regarding the first Cannot parse rpmlint output - the issue is created here https://pagure.io/FedoraReview/issue/461
the second bug is reproducable by running $ fedora-review --no-colors --prebuilt --rpm-spec --name NAME --define DISTTAG EDIT: it's a bug on fedora-review side. I updated the issue mentioned above. could be also a bug on fedora-review side
$ fedora-review --no-colors --prebuilt --rpm-spec --name NAME --define DISTTAG
This issue has been migrated to GitHub: https://github.com/fedora-copr/copr/issues/2296
Metadata Update from @nikromen: - Issue close_status updated to: MIGRATED - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
Login to comment on this ticket.