Hi!
I noticed that vast majority of C9S x86_64 machines in the Duffy pool is in Failed/Hardware_Failure state, and only two of them remain operational:
$ ./agent-control.py --list=all |& grep 9-stream INFO: 151 n24.crusty 172.19.2.24 crusty 6786 Failed None None None 9-stream x86_64 0 2230 None INFO: 178 n51.crusty 172.19.2.51 crusty 6284 Deployed 4fedea80 None None 9-stream x86_64 1 2500 None INFO: 181 n54.crusty 172.19.2.54 crusty 6284 Deployed e43de48b None None 9-stream x86_64 1 2530 None INFO: 191 n64.crusty 172.19.2.64 crusty 6786 Failed None None None 9-stream x86_64 0 2630 None INFO: 206 n15.dusty 172.19.2.79 dusty 6786 Failed None None None 9-stream x86_64 0 2140 None INFO: 256 n1.gusty 172.19.2.129 gusty 6786 Failed None None None 9-stream x86_64 0 2000 None INFO: 257 n2.gusty 172.19.2.130 gusty 6786 Failed None None None 9-stream x86_64 0 2010 None INFO: 258 n3.gusty 172.19.2.131 gusty 6786 Failed None None None 9-stream x86_64 0 2020 None INFO: 259 n4.gusty 172.19.2.132 gusty 6786 Failed None None None 9-stream x86_64 0 2030 None INFO: 260 n5.gusty 172.19.2.133 gusty 6786 Failed None None None 9-stream x86_64 0 2040 None INFO: 261 n6.gusty 172.19.2.134 gusty 6786 Failed None None None 9-stream x86_64 0 2050 None INFO: 263 n8.gusty 172.19.2.136 gusty 6786 Failed None None None 9-stream x86_64 0 2070 None INFO: 264 n9.gusty 172.19.2.137 gusty 6786 Failed None None None 9-stream x86_64 0 2080 None INFO: 265 n10.gusty 172.19.2.138 gusty 6786 Failed None None None 9-stream x86_64 0 2090 None INFO: 266 n11.gusty 172.19.2.139 gusty 6786 Failed None None None 9-stream x86_64 0 2100 None INFO: 269 n14.gusty 172.19.2.142 gusty 6786 Failed None None None 9-stream x86_64 0 2130 None INFO: 270 n15.gusty 172.19.2.143 gusty 6786 Failed None None None 9-stream x86_64 0 2140 None INFO: 277 n22.gusty 172.19.2.150 gusty 5734 Hardware_failure None None None 9-stream x86_64 1 2210 None INFO: 297 n42.gusty 172.19.2.170 gusty 6786 Failed None None None 9-stream x86_64 0 2410 None INFO: 298 n43.gusty 172.19.2.171 gusty 6786 Failed None None None 9-stream x86_64 0 2420 None INFO: 314 n59.gusty 172.19.2.187 gusty 5698 Hardware_failure None None None 9-stream x86_64 1 2580 None INFO: 356 n1.aah2 172.19.3.129 aah2 36 Active None None None 9-stream aarch64 0 0 medium INFO: 367 n3.aah3 172.19.3.140 aah3 46 Ready None None None 9-stream aarch64 1 0 medium INFO: 368 n4.aah3 172.19.3.141 aah3 45 Active None None None 9-stream aarch64 0 0 medium INFO: 371 n7.aah3 172.19.3.144 aah3 9 Ready None None None 9-stream aarch64 1 0 medium INFO: 372 n8.aah3 172.19.3.145 aah3 9 Ready None None None 9-stream aarch64 1 0 medium
I know the gusty chassis is out of commission, but would it be possible to bump the number of available C9S machines a bit?
Thanks!
There was a mail about migration to new version of Duffy. This should solve this issue.
Metadata Update from @zlopez: - Issue priority set to: Waiting on Reporter (was: Needs Review)
Metadata Update from @arrfab: - Issue tagged with: centos-ci-infra
closing, per discussion with @mrc0mmand on #centos-ci irc channel
Metadata Update from @arrfab: - Issue close_status updated to: Fixed - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
Login to comment on this ticket.