#4025 Fix minor typos in docs
Closed 5 years ago by jhrozek. Opened 5 years ago by yurchor.
SSSD/ yurchor/sssd master  into  master

file modified
+2 -2
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ 

                          </para>

                          <para>

                              The krb5_kdcinfo_lookahead option contains two

-                             numbers seperated by a colon. The first number represents

+                             numbers separated by a colon. The first number represents

                              number of primary servers used and the second number

                              specifies the number of backup servers.

                          </para>
@@ -526,7 +526,7 @@ 

                              <citerefentry>

                                  <refentrytitle>sssd_krb5_locator_plugin</refentrytitle>

                                  <manvolnum>8</manvolnum>

-                             </citerefentry>.

+                             </citerefentry>

                              but no backup servers.

                          </para>

                          <para>

file modified
+6 -6
@@ -3110,7 +3110,7 @@ 

                                              and GID numbers have the same

                                              value and at the same time the

                                              GID number does not correspond

-                                             to a real group object in LDAP

+                                             to a real group object in LDAP.

                                              If the values are the same, but

                                              the primary GID in the user entry

                                              is also used by a group object,
@@ -3596,12 +3596,12 @@ 

              With the growing number of authentication methods and the

              possibility that there are multiple ones for a single user the

              heuristic used by pam_sss to select the prompting might not be

-             suitable for all use cases. To following options should provide a

+             suitable for all use cases. The following options should provide a

              better flexibility here.

          </para>

          <para>

-             Each supported authentication method has it's own configuration

-             sub-section under <quote>[prompting/...]</quote>. Currently there

+             Each supported authentication method has its own configuration

+             subsection under <quote>[prompting/...]</quote>. Currently there

              are:

          <variablelist>

              <varlistentry>
@@ -3632,7 +3632,7 @@ 

                          <varlistentry><term>single_prompt</term>

                          <listitem><para>boolean value, if True there will be

                          only a single prompt using the value of first_prompt

-                         where it is expected that both factor are entered as a

+                         where it is expected that both factors are entered as a

                          single string</para></listitem>

                          </varlistentry>

                      </variablelist>
@@ -3642,7 +3642,7 @@ 

          </variablelist>

          </para>

          <para>

-             It is possible to add a sub-section for specific PAM services like

+             It is possible to add a subsection for specific PAM services,

              e.g. <quote>[prompting/password/sshd]</quote> to individual change

              the prompting for this service.

          </para>

Many thanks in advance for reviewing this PR.

Pull-Request has been closed by jhrozek

5 years ago