#2243 [RFE] Socket-activate responders
Closed: Fixed None Opened 5 years ago by jhrozek.

Some responders, such as ssh or sudo don't have to be running all the time, but can be socket activated instead.

We should optionally allow responders to be socket-activated. This would require changes to the monitor code, in particular how we start responders and how we ping them.


Fields changed

milestone: NEEDS_TRIAGE => SSSD 1.13 beta
rhbz: => 0
summary: RFE: Socket-activate responders => [RFE] Socket-activate responders

Please also check out #2292 when working on this ticket.

Fields changed

mark: => 1

Makes sense for the local backend

milestone: SSSD 1.13 beta => SSSD 1.13 backlog

Mass-moving tickets not planned for the 1.13 release to 1.14

milestone: SSSD 1.13 backlog => SSSD 1.14 beta

Required for the secrets-as-a-service work.

sensitive: => 0

Fields changed

owner: somebody => simo
patch: 0 => 1

On second thougt, I created (and closed) ticket #3070. I think it would be better to keep this ticket open until all the tooling and documentation is in place and responders are started with systemd in upstream by default on platforms that support it.

milestone: SSSD 1.14 beta => SSSD 1.16 beta
patch: 1 => 0

Fields changed

design: => https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/DesignDocs/SocketActivatableResponders
design_review: 0 => 1
owner: simo => fidencio

Patch set is part of pull-request 94 (https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/94)

_comment0: Patches are part of the PR#84:
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/84 => 1480031796323833
patch: 0 => 1

Fields changed

milestone: SSSD Future releases (no date set yet) => SSSD 1.15 Alpha

Metadata Update from @jhrozek:
- Issue assigned to fidencio
- Issue marked as blocked by: #3245
- Issue set to the milestone: SSSD 1.15.0

2 years ago

Login to comment on this ticket.

Metadata