Learn more about these different git repos.
Other Git URLs
In my rfc2307 LDAP setup, group containing a system user appear empty if filter_users_in_groups and enumerate are enabled.
After disabling filter_users_in_groups or enumerate or removing the system user from the group, the other group members are shown again.
The attached log shows sssd startup, a "getent group withroot" at 08:58:28 and a "getent group withoutroot" at 08:58:40.
attachment sssd-filter.log
Fields changed
cc: => bergolth
milestone: NEEDS_TRIAGE => SSSD 1.9.4 priority: major => minor
milestone: SSSD 1.9.4 => SSSD 1.10 beta rhbz: => todo
selected: => Not need
Moving tickets that are not a priority for SSSD 1.10 into the next release.
milestone: SSSD 1.10 beta => SSSD 1.11 beta
I've hit this too, and observed what happens to the ldb cache file by dumping it a couple of times and comparing.
What happens here is basically the following (assuming the clean run with empty cache):
Not sure what's the expected behavior thought. Attaching a 3-way compare of my ldb dumps (shortened. beware it's a 200-column file)
_comment0: I've hit this too, and observed what happens to the ldb cache file by dumping it a couple of times and comparing.
Not sure what's the expected behavior thought. Attaching a 3-way compare of my ldb dumps (shortened. beware it's a 200-column file) => 1396033037743060 changelog: => review: => 0
Three way compare of cache file dump as the poisoning/corruption happens enumerate.txt
cc: bergolth => bergolth, lkundrak@v3.sk
I'm not dismissing the bug report, but is there actually any reason to use enumeration at the moment? I would recommend to not use it, at least with large directories.
Replying to [comment:8 jhrozek]:
I don't really need it. A good enough workaround for me to address this issue is just disabling it.
mark: => 0
milestone: SSSD 1.13 beta => SSSD 1.13 backlog
Mass-moving tickets not planned for the next two releases.
Please reply with a comment if you disagree about the move..
milestone: SSSD 1.13 backlog => SSSD 1.15 beta
Metadata Update from @bergolth: - Issue set to the milestone: SSSD Future releases (no date set yet)
Metadata Update from @thalman: - Custom field design_review reset (from 0) - Custom field mark reset (from 0) - Custom field patch reset (from 0) - Custom field review reset (from 0) - Custom field testsupdated reset (from 0) - Issue close_status updated to: None - Issue tagged with: Canditate to close
Thank you for taking time to submit this request for SSSD. Unfortunately this issue was not given priority and the team lacks the capacity to work on it at this time.
Given that we are unable to fulfill this request I am closing the issue as wontfix.
If the issue still persist on recent SSSD you can request re-consideration of this decision by reopening this issue. Please provide additional technical details about its importance to you.
Thank you for understanding.
Metadata Update from @pbrezina: - Issue close_status updated to: wontfix - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
SSSD is moving from Pagure to Github. This means that new issues and pull requests will be accepted only in SSSD's github repository.
This issue has been cloned to Github and is available here: - https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/issues/2706
If you want to receive further updates on the issue, please navigate to the github issue and click on subscribe button.
subscribe
Thank you for understanding. We apologize for all inconvenience.
Log in to comment on this ticket.