#1469 [RFE] Implement LOCAL provider as a real provider

Created 5 years ago by jhrozek
Modified 8 months ago

This came up on the upstream devel list:

Right now, we check if the provider is local or not in each data-specific loop. There's one check for users, one check for groups etc. Implementing the local provider as a real provider would have the benefit of keeping the logic same on the responder side regardless of the provider type and also make extending the local provider easier in the future.

Fields changed

milestone: NEEDS_TRIAGE => SSSD 1.11 beta
rhbz: => todo

Fields changed

proposed_priority: => Nice to have

Moving all the features planned for 1.10 release into 1.10 beta.

milestone: SSSD 1.11 beta => SSSD 1.10 beta

Fields changed

priority: major => minor

Fields changed

design: =>
design_review: => 0
fedora_test_page: =>
summary: Implement LOCAL provider as a real provider => [RFE] Implement LOCAL provider as a real provider
type: defect => enhancement

Fields changed

selected: => Not need

Moving tickets that are not a priority for SSSD 1.10 into the next release.

milestone: SSSD 1.10 beta => SSSD 1.11 beta

Fields changed

changelog: =>
milestone: SSSD 1.13 beta => SSSD 2.0
review: => 0

moving the ticket to needs_triage for discussion.

mark: => 0
milestone: SSSD 2.0 => NEEDS_TRIAGE
sensitive: => 0

The local provider is not actively developed anymore. When we upstream the work on the files provider, we either deprecate or remove the local provider completely.

In the meantime, I'm moving this ticket into "Patches welcome".

milestone: NEEDS_TRIAGE => SSSD Patches welcome

We will actually remove the local provider.

review: 0 => 1

The files provider was implemented instead.

resolution: => wontfix
status: new => closed

8 months ago

Metadata Update from @jhrozek:
- Issue set to the milestone: SSSD Patches welcome

Login to comment on this ticket.




Not need