1. Currently, we elect one Council representative every six months, for a twelve-month term. I think the idea was to provide continuity. However:
   • In practice, this stagger is more confusing than useful. We have a lot of longer-term Council positions.
   • It doubles the election overhead. Likewise, it's actually easier to bring on two new people at once.
   • I have an unsupported intuition that we'd get more interest and attention when it's not just one seat available.
   • A new person elected in November makes it hard to plan for our annual in-person meeting in January or early February.

Therefore, I propose that we move to having both elected reps aligned with the April/May release -- still a 1-year term, but both at the same time. We could either

A. Make the presently-to-be-elected term a short one, ending in 6 months.
B. Go the other way, and make it 18 months.
C. Extend the current term by six months, skipping the current election.

My suggestion would be C, presuming the current representative (@bookwar) is up for it.

1. While we're at a it, what do you all think about expanding the number of elected reps from two to three? With the new Executive Sponsor duty, and with everything we've got planned, I feel like more is merrier.