#412 Side by side
Opened 6 years ago by churchyard. Modified 2 years ago

Badge description (like "You added a co-maintainer to a package. BFF!"): You've built a package in a side tag.

Help the badges team understand what this idea is all about. If this badge is awarded for certain kinds of activities:
1) What are those activities?

Trigger a build of any package in any side tag in Koji.

2) Who is doing them (are they packagers? translators? newcomers? veterans? users? sponsors?)

Packagers.

3) Why are they doing them (is this a means to a different end?)

When a new version of important lib is released.

4) When do they do them (every day? once a year?)

Side tags in Koji only happen when certain stack needs a rebuild. This is not very often, usually a few times a year.

5) How do they do them (by talking in IRC? by running commands in the console? by using a web interface?)

By using fedpkg.

Lastly, do you have any ideas for artwork concepts?

Some characters (badgers or pandas) standing side by side.


I think we could come up with a better concept for this one. If its Koji related, maybe we should try to include that logo in. My best idea would be to have a package, with a tag on it that also has a package on it? I am not sure that makes sense :P Anyone else have ideas?

I think we could come up with a better concept for this one. If its Koji related, maybe we should try to include that logo in. My best idea would be to have a package, with a tag on it that also has a package on it? I am not sure that makes sense :P Anyone else have ideas?

Discussed in [https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2016-11-02/fedora_badges.2016-11-02-11.05.html 2016-10-03 meeting].

riecatnor can correct me if wrong, but I think this badge concept is good to go, and it's ready for a designer to try tackling it. Triaging ticket and leaving it open for any future designers to go for. :)

Discussed in [https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2016-11-02/fedora_badges.2016-11-02-11.05.html 2016-10-03 meeting].

riecatnor can correct me if wrong, but I think this badge concept is good to go, and it's ready for a designer to try tackling it. Triaging ticket and leaving it open for any future designers to go for. :)

Here's what I've got in the works for now:
[[Image(ticket#412_attempt1.png)]]

Here's what I've got in the works for now:
[[Image(ticket#412_attempt1.png)]]

I'm not sure if that says "side tag" at all.

I'm not sure if that says "side tag" at all.

@churchyard, I'm not sure I know what you mean?

@churchyard, I'm not sure I know what you mean?

@maryshak1996 Sorry about that. I was trying to say that this badge proposal is about "side tag" and the picture you've provided makes the "tag" part very hidden and the "package" part more like a "present" or "gif".

I'm not a member of the design team, so my opinions are only based on what i feel and may not be relevant. However, if you are interested, I suggest you look at the following badges for tags:

https://badges.fedoraproject.org/badge/master-tagger-tagger-iv
https://badges.fedoraproject.org/badge/tagger-tagger-ii
https://badges.fedoraproject.org/badge/junior-tagger-tagger-i
https://badges.fedoraproject.org/badge/macklemore-tagger-v
https://badges.fedoraproject.org/badge/senior-tagger-tagger-iii

And packages:

https://badges.fedoraproject.org/badge/appdata-tributary
https://badges.fedoraproject.org/badge/proven-packager
https://badges.fedoraproject.org/badge/united-packages-of-fedora
https://badges.fedoraproject.org/badge/the-cat-came-back...
https://badges.fedoraproject.org/badge/the-tower-of-babel-koji-success-vii
https://badges.fedoraproject.org/badge/building-the-outer-ring-copr-build-iii
https://badges.fedoraproject.org/badge/you-can-call-me-patches-scm-i

And packages with tags:

https://badges.fedoraproject.org/badge/zomg-package-tagger-package-tagger-vii
https://badges.fedoraproject.org/badge/master-package-tagger-package-tagger-iv
https://badges.fedoraproject.org/badge/package-tagger-package-tagger-ii

And non-package badge similar to your proposal:

https://badges.fedoraproject.org/badge/consolation-prize

@riecatnor Also now when I'm looking at the "packages with tags" section of links above, I think your proposal about design may be easily confused with this series, what do you think?

@maryshak1996 Sorry about that. I was trying to say that this badge proposal is about "side tag" and the picture you've provided makes the "tag" part very hidden and the "package" part more like a "present" or "gif".

I'm not a member of the design team, so my opinions are only based on what i feel and may not be relevant. However, if you are interested, I suggest you look at the following badges for tags:

https://badges.fedoraproject.org/badge/master-tagger-tagger-iv
https://badges.fedoraproject.org/badge/tagger-tagger-ii
https://badges.fedoraproject.org/badge/junior-tagger-tagger-i
https://badges.fedoraproject.org/badge/macklemore-tagger-v
https://badges.fedoraproject.org/badge/senior-tagger-tagger-iii

And packages:

https://badges.fedoraproject.org/badge/appdata-tributary
https://badges.fedoraproject.org/badge/proven-packager
https://badges.fedoraproject.org/badge/united-packages-of-fedora
https://badges.fedoraproject.org/badge/the-cat-came-back...
https://badges.fedoraproject.org/badge/the-tower-of-babel-koji-success-vii
https://badges.fedoraproject.org/badge/building-the-outer-ring-copr-build-iii
https://badges.fedoraproject.org/badge/you-can-call-me-patches-scm-i

And packages with tags:

https://badges.fedoraproject.org/badge/zomg-package-tagger-package-tagger-vii
https://badges.fedoraproject.org/badge/master-package-tagger-package-tagger-iv
https://badges.fedoraproject.org/badge/package-tagger-package-tagger-ii

And non-package badge similar to your proposal:

https://badges.fedoraproject.org/badge/consolation-prize

@riecatnor Also now when I'm looking at the "packages with tags" section of links above, I think your proposal about design may be easily confused with this series, what do you think?

@churchyard, thanks for posting those... definitely helped to know kind of an idea of what it should look like is! I took from some of the package/ tag designs that you posted and created something new:
[[Image(ticket#412_attempt2.png)]]

@churchyard, thanks for posting those... definitely helped to know kind of an idea of what it should look like is! I took from some of the package/ tag designs that you posted and created something new:
[[Image(ticket#412_attempt2.png)]]

Hopefully this new design fits the concept a little bit better than the first one!

Hopefully this new design fits the concept a little bit better than the first one!

This looks much better, thank you! Why did you choose green for the package? I'm not saying it's wrong or anything, I'm just curious.

This looks much better, thank you! Why did you choose green for the package? I'm not saying it's wrong or anything, I'm just curious.

Ooohh, this looks nice. :) Further triaging ticket…

Ooohh, this looks nice. :) Further triaging ticket…

@churchyard The green was just to try something a little different that also complimented the light blue background well, but the color is certainly open to discussion too :)

@churchyard The green was just to try something a little different that also complimented the light blue background well, but the color is certainly open to discussion too :)

I'm not challenging it form the design perspective. The only thing that concerns me is that so far package was always cardboard colored. I've prepared 4 color variants just to put here to see others opinion. (The position of the packages on those is not perfect, I'v just tried to make the color visible.)

I've also noticed that the badge is not positioned in the center of the page.

[[Image(side-tag-gg.png)]] [[Image(side-tag-gc.png)]] [[Image(side-tag-cc.png)]] [[Image(side-tag-cg.png)]]

I must say that the cardboard only colored one is boring.
I like the cardboard package with green tag. What about you?

I'm not challenging it form the design perspective. The only thing that concerns me is that so far package was always cardboard colored. I've prepared 4 color variants just to put here to see others opinion. (The position of the packages on those is not perfect, I'v just tried to make the color visible.)

I've also noticed that the badge is not positioned in the center of the page.

[[Image(side-tag-gg.png)]] [[Image(side-tag-gc.png)]] [[Image(side-tag-cc.png)]] [[Image(side-tag-cg.png)]]

I must say that the cardboard only colored one is boring.
I like the cardboard package with green tag. What about you?

I agree that the green tag/ cardboard package looks good! I just centered the design of the tag and changed the badge to this color combination:
[[Image(ticket#412_attempt3.png)]]

I agree that the green tag/ cardboard package looks good! I just centered the design of the tag and changed the badge to this color combination:
[[Image(ticket#412_attempt3.png)]]

I love it <3.

Let's just wait for someone from the design team to say their judgement.

I love it <3.

Let's just wait for someone from the design team to say their judgement.

Nice work so far maryshak1996!

Two suggestions for you:
1. Can you try a version where the graphics are centered in the middle of the badge, similar to this one: https://badges.fedoraproject.org/badge/associate-editor

  1. Can you try a version where the background flat with a pattern, or has a simple gradient?

Thanks!

Nice work so far maryshak1996!

Two suggestions for you:
1. Can you try a version where the graphics are centered in the middle of the badge, similar to this one: https://badges.fedoraproject.org/badge/associate-editor

  1. Can you try a version where the background flat with a pattern, or has a simple gradient?

Thanks!

riecatnor; here's what you mentioned :)
[[Image(ticket#412_attempt4.png)]]

riecatnor; here's what you mentioned :)
[[Image(ticket#412_attempt4.png)]]

Looks great!!

Can you try a version with a darker outline on the front tag? Otherwise, this badge is very close to completion :)

Looks great!!

Can you try a version with a darker outline on the front tag? Otherwise, this badge is very close to completion :)

[[Image(ticket#412_attempt5.png)]]

[[Image(ticket#412_attempt5.png)]]

Metadata Update from @churchyard:
- Issue assigned to maryshak1996
- Issue tagged with: easyfix

4 years ago

@maryshak1996, outline looks good! I noticed now the "string" between the two graphics is light green, and it's getting lost... Maybe it could be the same dark green, or grey? Let me know what you think

Metadata Update from @riecatnor:
- Custom field artwork adjusted to None
- Custom field concept_review_passed adjusted to None (was: 1)
- Custom field has_complete_yaml reset (from None)
- Custom field has_description reset (from 0)
- Custom field has_name adjusted to on (was: 1)
- Custom field needs_manual_award reset (from 0)
- Custom field triaged adjusted to on (was: 1)
- Issue close_status updated to: None

4 years ago

Metadata Update from @riecatnor:
- Custom field artwork adjusted to has_draft (was: None)
- Custom field has_complete_yaml reset (from false)
- Custom field has_description reset (from false)
- Custom field needs_manual_award reset (from false)

4 years ago

Metadata Update from @riecatnor:
- Custom field has_complete_yaml reset (from false)
- Custom field has_description reset (from false)
- Custom field needs_manual_award reset (from false)
- Issue tagged with: development

4 years ago

Metadata Update from @maryshak1996:
- Custom field has_complete_yaml reset (from false)
- Custom field has_description reset (from false)
- Custom field needs_manual_award reset (from false)

4 years ago

Metadata Update from @maryshak1996:
- Custom field has_complete_yaml reset (from false)
- Custom field has_description reset (from false)
- Custom field needs_manual_award reset (from false)

4 years ago

Closing this ticket due to inactivity during Badges virtual hackfest. Please reopen if their is renewed interest. Thanks!

Metadata Update from @riecatnor:
- Custom field has_complete_yaml reset (from false)
- Custom field has_description reset (from false)
- Custom field needs_manual_award reset (from false)
- Issue close_status updated to: declined
- Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)

2 years ago

Metadata Update from @churchyard:
- Custom field has_complete_yaml reset (from false)
- Custom field has_description reset (from false)
- Custom field needs_manual_award reset (from false)
- Issue status updated to: Open (was: Closed)

2 years ago

Login to comment on this ticket.

Metadata
Attachments 20
Attached 5 years ago View Comment
Attached 5 years ago View Comment
Attached 5 years ago View Comment
Attached 5 years ago View Comment
Attached 5 years ago View Comment
Attached 5 years ago View Comment
Attached 5 years ago View Comment
Attached 5 years ago View Comment
Attached 5 years ago View Comment
Attached 5 years ago View Comment
Attached 5 years ago View Comment
Attached 5 years ago View Comment
Attached 5 years ago View Comment
Attached 5 years ago View Comment
Attached 4 years ago View Comment
Attached 4 years ago View Comment
Attached 4 years ago View Comment
Attached 4 years ago View Comment
Attached 4 years ago View Comment
Attached 4 years ago View Comment