Issue #9: Investigate possibility of introduction of "Container packager" group - container-sig

ContainerSIG / container-sig

#9 Investigate possibility of introduction of "Container packager" group

Opened 5 years ago by jcajka. Modified 5 years ago

Investigate possibility of addition of "Container packager" group similar to "RPM packagers" group, but only interested in the apps/container side of things. Or alternatively if current packager group is good enough, extend the packager documentation to not only cover the RPM side of the things. So it is obvious as way to get involved/contribute in the containers.
Like: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group

ttomecek commented 5 years ago

+1 on having a "container packager" group; should we discuss this with fesco or fpc?

cverna commented 5 years ago

@pingou, will src.fp.o support having a "container packager" group, with only access to the container namespace ?

hguemar commented 5 years ago

This should be raised to Fesco as they are the proper instance. Personally, I am not convinced we need another group, especially as of now, RPM and containers are tied in Fedora.

ttomecek commented 5 years ago

In the end, the solution may be to make someone from the sig sponsor.