Description:
The wrong printf format was used for displaying the nanosecond etime in the access log.
relates: https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/50655
Reviewed by: ?
I think it should be .%09 because the 0 is a left-padding character when the input is < 9 which can/will happen.
rebased onto 225f4e179d4d61cbcf5991cf99a1a6fa49070311
Yeah this seems to give the expected results. Patch has been updated...
Ack :) thanks for fixing william-of-the-pasts mistake.
Pull-Request has been merged by mreynolds
389-ds-base is moving from Pagure to Github. This means that new issues and pull requests will be accepted only in 389-ds-base's github repository.
This pull request has been cloned to Github as issue and is available here: - https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/issues/3711
If you want to continue to work on the PR, please navigate to the github issue, download the patch from the attachments and file a new pull request.
Thank you for understanding. We apologize for all inconvenience.
Pull-Request has been closed by spichugi
Description:
The wrong printf format was used for displaying the nanosecond etime in the access log.
relates: https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/50655
Reviewed by: ?