Bug Description: Implement a lib389 dn test to show we have correct behaviour with dn derivation in lib389 creation.
Fix Description: Add test case.
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/50259
Author: William Brown william@blackhats.net.au
Review by: ???
Add the docstrings, please. All the tests under suites are used for generating test plans. It uses the certain docstring structure that can be found in other test suites.
suites
Opps. Yep, I'll add those.
No problem mate, added these :)
rebased onto 907ffbabb2f1892459dafd057ecee4e9c9e335cf
You can remove these comments now and uncomment the rest. It should work with my recently merged PR
Yep, I'll make that PR today then.
Updated, thanks!
rebased onto cbdbd0e65a6bf505b0de5c0137bf257f1e926b5c
LGTM!
rebased onto 813030cc7a82fd5789cc92052b34f8c8ebc9e93a
Pull-Request has been merged by firstyear
389-ds-base is moving from Pagure to Github. This means that new issues and pull requests will be accepted only in 389-ds-base's github repository.
This pull request has been cloned to Github as issue and is available here: - https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/issues/3326
If you want to continue to work on the PR, please navigate to the github issue, download the patch from the attachments and file a new pull request.
Thank you for understanding. We apologize for all inconvenience.
Pull-Request has been closed by spichugi
Bug Description: Implement a lib389 dn test to show we have correct
behaviour with dn derivation in lib389 creation.
Fix Description: Add test case.
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/50259
Author: William Brown william@blackhats.net.au
Review by: ???