Making an actual Anonymous type in lib389/idm/account.py
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/50211
Reviewed by: ???
rebased onto aefbcd0c02993350d0e06265c887777e661ae6d6
This looks really good. I think you need to also define a
def __init__(self, instance): super(Anonymous, self).__init__(instance, dn=None)
This way there is "no way" someone can make anonymous with a dn that is not none.
Once you do that, I'll review again, and will merge :)
rebased onto b4292904f01ee466633bce4a0324a83da13a3407
rebased onto 2dc2b4f81f800c60f3579419b9f730d59c567261
@firstyear changes has been done as per you suggestion
Is this comment for init? Or for bind? Whitespace looks a bit weird ...
rebased onto aa00ecbd140af2b46f4e9f9e466679a56bcbc26f
@firstyear white space and comment removed
Why did you remove this function?
rebased onto d68b131e0f36151c70b3cc78e7da4e7c5735af81
@firstyear git mistake , now its ok
Pull-Request has been merged by firstyear
389-ds-base is moving from Pagure to Github. This means that new issues and pull requests will be accepted only in 389-ds-base's github repository.
This pull request has been cloned to Github as issue and is available here: - https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/issues/3273
If you want to continue to work on the PR, please navigate to the github issue, download the patch from the attachments and file a new pull request.
Thank you for understanding. We apologize for all inconvenience.
Pull-Request has been closed by spichugi
Making an actual Anonymous type in lib389/idm/account.py
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/50211
Reviewed by: ???