There are two variants of idl index format: old and new
The "new" is the default for many years and proven. There is a propoasal to use bit ranges to store idl lists and the POC looks very promising, so that would be a new-new version.
We should not maintain all versions, it is time to remove the "old" format in future versions
Metadata Update from @mreynolds: - Custom field component adjusted to None - Custom field origin adjusted to None - Custom field reviewstatus adjusted to None - Custom field type adjusted to None - Custom field version adjusted to None - Issue set to the milestone: 1.4.0
Metadata Update from @vashirov: - Issue priority set to: normal - Issue set to the milestone: FUTURE (was: 1.4.0)
Metadata Update from @mreynolds: - Issue tagged with: lmdb
389-ds-base is moving from Pagure to Github. This means that new issues and pull requests will be accepted only in 389-ds-base's github repository.
This issue has been cloned to Github and is available here: - https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/issues/2547
If you want to receive further updates on the issue, please navigate to the github issue and click on subscribe button.
subscribe
Thank you for understanding. We apologize for all inconvenience.
Metadata Update from @spichugi: - Issue close_status updated to: wontfix - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
Login to comment on this ticket.