#49416 IDL Range Format
Closed: wontfix 3 years ago by spichugi. Opened 6 years ago by firstyear.

Issue Description

Based on discussions and the POC https://github.com/Firstyear/idl_rust/ there are many cases where a change to the IDL format may yield faster searches due to compression and reduced instruction comphrehension. We should support different index formats listed by some flag in the start of the IDL, and we should support this format as one option,


Metadata Update from @mreynolds:
- Custom field component adjusted to None
- Custom field origin adjusted to None
- Custom field reviewstatus adjusted to None
- Custom field type adjusted to None
- Custom field version adjusted to None
- Issue set to the milestone: 1.4 backlog

6 years ago

389-ds-base is moving from Pagure to Github. This means that new issues and pull requests
will be accepted only in 389-ds-base's github repository.

This issue has been cloned to Github and is available here:
- https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/issues/2475

If you want to receive further updates on the issue, please navigate to the github issue
and click on subscribe button.

Thank you for understanding. We apologize for all inconvenience.

Metadata Update from @spichugi:
- Issue close_status updated to: wontfix
- Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)

3 years ago

Login to comment on this ticket.

Metadata