Description of problem:
if a filter is specified as (&(x=y)) instead of (x=y), this could provoke a
certain degradation in cases filter is evaluated for large number of
The workaround is obvious: use a well designed filter.
Ludwig, thank you for taking care of this issue!
Author: Ludwig Krispenz email@example.com
Date: Thu Aug 14 12:35:40 2014 +0200
Ticket 47872 - Filter AND with only one clause should be optimized
56d8a5b..39adbdc 389-ds-base-1.3.2 -> 389-ds-base-1.3.2
5e6bee9..a791bff 389-ds-base-1.2.11 -> 389-ds-base-1.2.11
Metadata Update from @nhosoi:
- Issue assigned to lkrispen
- Issue set to the milestone: 22.214.171.124
389-ds-base is moving from Pagure to Github. This means that new issues and pull requests
will be accepted only in 389-ds-base's github repository.
This issue has been cloned to Github and is available here:
If you want to receive further updates on the issue, please navigate to the github issue
and click on subscribe button.
Thank you for understanding. We apologize for all inconvenience.
Metadata Update from @spichugi:
- Issue close_status updated to: wontfix (was: Fixed)
to comment on this ticket.